<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[mysql 5.1 Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mysql+5.1.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to mysql 5.1]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="3" found="3" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Sun announces GA of mySQL 5.1]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=55189&messageID=1044178&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Sun announces GA of mySQL 5.1another nail in M$' SQL ServerGood work, M$ is loosing another cash cow!Notes to check on 5.11. bugs reported on 5.1, http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2008/11/oops-we-did-it-again-mysql-51-released.html2. the $CASH$ is only moving to other company SUN, their policy for the community version is annoying.]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 07:44:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/databases.html"><![CDATA[Databases]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/enterprise+software.html"><![CDATA[Enterprise software]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mysql+5.1.html"><![CDATA[mySQL 5.1]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sun+microsystems+inc..html"><![CDATA[Sun Microsystems Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mysql.html"><![CDATA[MySQL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">JAVA</category>
		<category domain="tickers">JAVA</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Sun warns of bugs as it releases MySQL 5.1]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9595-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=54870&messageID=1038337&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Sun warns of bugs as it releases MySQL 5.1Good questionI first question why the first priority wasn't on fixing the bugs instead of adding features. I secondly question the purpose of including features that are of beta quality - if they need 'real world testing' then they should have included...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 12:40:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mysql+5.1.html"><![CDATA[MySQL 5.1]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sun+microsystems+inc..html"><![CDATA[Sun Microsystems Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mysql.html"><![CDATA[MySQL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">JAVA</category>
		<category domain="tickers">JAVA</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Sun debuts MySQL 5.1 with no licensing change]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=46639&messageID=865727&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Sun debuts MySQL 5.1 with no licensing changeSUN Java components ran through Core3 JRE handed to Megellan.Good stuff that came out 16_b6; if that's nothing theirs is quad Certifide and might not have the Coffee Cup anylonger. This was to improve IE7 using Windows and it did. Athlon64 2.2 3400+]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:11:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mysql+5.1.html"><![CDATA[MySQL 5.1]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sun+microsystems+inc..html"><![CDATA[Sun Microsystems Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mysql.html"><![CDATA[MySQL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">JAVA</category>
		<category domain="tickers">JAVA</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
