<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[murray Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/murray.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to murray]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="3" found="3" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Connect the Google dots: In war on spam, GMail's IMAP support hints at 'auto-unsubscribe' standard]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Berlind/?p=871]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Boy those folks at Google are clever when it comes to spam. The question is whether a technology that they probably have in the works in their labs will be one that can and will be embraced by other major participants in the Internet's e-mail ecosystem.  First, an introduction...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:38:43 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/google+inc..html"><![CDATA[Google Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/google+gmail.html"><![CDATA[Google Gmail]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/problem.html"><![CDATA[Problem]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sender.html"><![CDATA[Sender]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/imap.html"><![CDATA[IMAP]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/murray.html"><![CDATA[Murray]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/e-mail.html"><![CDATA[E-mail]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cyberthreats.html"><![CDATA[Cyberthreats]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/spam.html"><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/online+communications.html"><![CDATA[Online Communications]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/spam+and+phishing.html"><![CDATA[Spam And Phishing]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/david+berlind.html"><![CDATA[David Berlind]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GOOG</category>
		<category domain="tickers">GOOG</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Is OSS less reliable?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=21193&messageID=404532&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Is OSS less reliable?hypocritical ployi think this is a hypocritical marketing ploy by MS to get back at markets, consumers, anyone who'll listen. most people in the field know better. MS commercial software is about as stable as a teenage girl in a committed relationship. yeah, its better than some...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 08:26:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tools+%2526+techniques.html"><![CDATA[Tools & Techniques]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/oss.html"><![CDATA[OSS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software.html"><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/murray.html"><![CDATA[Murray]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Is OSS less reliable?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Orchant/?p=107]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[That's certainly the impression you'd get from reading the headline and money quote from an article posted at C|Net's News.com today. "Microsoft: Open source 'not reliable or dependable' blares the headline. There's a certain tabloid sensationalism running rampant amongst tech site headline writers to be sure. Hey, I've been known...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 07:53:05 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/commercial+software.html"><![CDATA[commercial software]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/murray.html"><![CDATA[Murray]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/oss.html"><![CDATA[OSS]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
