<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[ms obviously Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ms+obviously.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to ms obviously]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="4" found="4" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Poll: Is Microsoft's Windows 7 E a stroke of genius?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12558-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=65548&messageID=1226751&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Poll: Is Microsoft's Windows 7 E a stroke of genius?I think you need more options.I think it's a brilliant move on Microsoft's part. But I wouldn't be surprised to see the EU reject it. I think they want to force MS to install other browsers (one who's name shall not...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:44:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/web+browsers.html"><![CDATA[Web browsers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ms+obviously.html"><![CDATA[MS obviously]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+internet+explorer.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/web+browser.html"><![CDATA[Web browser]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+7+e.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows 7 E]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/stroke.html"><![CDATA[stroke]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Microsoft seeking Win 7 testers for netbooks?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12558-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=56816&messageID=1075582&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft seeking Win 7 testers for netbooks?Garbageware 7Install Fedora 10 and be done...Gee, end users being the QC department?  Status quo since 1995, then...Even if bugs are found, they may not be fixed until the next product release. (if that's true for application software, it's undoubtedly true for the...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:21:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/netbooks%252c+nettops+%2526+mids.html"><![CDATA[Netbooks, nettops & MIDs]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ms+obviously.html"><![CDATA[MS obviously]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/netbook.html"><![CDATA[netbook]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+system.html"><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[SQL Server 2005 SP1 won&#39;t work with Vista]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12558-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=26866&messageID=504684&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[SQL Server 2005 SP1 won&#39;t work with VistaThis has been reportedsee this story CRNSQL Server 2005 SP2 and VistaThanks for the link. The part I thought was interesting was that SP2 is due to go to CTP "sometime soon." It's still not even in test yet.This is hardly a scandalIt's...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:04:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista+%2528longhorn%2529.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista (Longhorn)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+xp+service+pack+2.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 2]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/databases.html"><![CDATA[Databases]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/enterprise+software.html"><![CDATA[Enterprise software]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+data+engine.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Data Engine]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ms+obviously.html"><![CDATA[MS obviously]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+sql+server.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft SQL Server]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+sql+server+2005.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft SQL Server 2005]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sql.html"><![CDATA[SQL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/server.html"><![CDATA[server]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Does Microsoft's settlement fever signal IP offensive?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-3513-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=6396&messageID=128970&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Does Microsoft's settlement fever signal IP offensive?IP Offensive?MS obviously is worried about IP issues.  They settled with Novell because of Novell's threat to use their own IP in the defense of Linux, etc.  Lest people forget,  most MS software still uses Novell's NCP.  You just can...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2004 06:25:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tools+%2526+techniques.html"><![CDATA[Tools & Techniques]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ms+obviously.html"><![CDATA[MS obviously]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/does+microsoft.html"><![CDATA[Does Microsoft]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ip.html"><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software.html"><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/novell+inc..html"><![CDATA[Novell Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software+patent.html"><![CDATA[software patent]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ibm+corp..html"><![CDATA[IBM Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">IBM</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">NOVL</category>
		<category domain="tickers">IBM,MSFT,NOVL</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
