<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[ms just Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ms+just.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to ms just]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="9" found="9" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[MS Patch Tuesday: 9 bulletins, 6 rated critical]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12691-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=66744&messageID=1261393&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[MS Patch Tuesday: 9 bulletins, 6 rated criticalChalk up another win for Vista.All the vulnerabilities affecting the desktop OS are mitigated through standard user rights and Protected Mode.what about netbooks?So people who are running XP on their shiny, new netbooks are out of luck?  MS just says "sorry we...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:50:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/netbooks%252c+nettops+%2526+mids.html"><![CDATA[Netbooks, nettops & MIDs]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/netbook.html"><![CDATA[netbook]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+xp.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows XP]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Who should Software Freedom sue on FAT32?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=61713&messageID=1137119&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Who should Software Freedom sue on FAT32?What did MS do wrong?They are not bound by the GPL.  They are free to license their technology to anyone they want, under terms agreeable to both. (I assume there might be some Federal restrictions there, but I don't think we crossed that...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 08:29:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[OPEN SOURCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ms+just.html"><![CDATA[MS Just]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/fat32.html"><![CDATA[FAT32]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software+freedom+sue.html"><![CDATA[Software Freedom Sue]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/gpl.html"><![CDATA[GPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/msft.html"><![CDATA[MSFT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software.html"><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[What if News Corp., MSN and Yahoo were a separate company?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12558-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=46483&messageID=861673&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[What if News Corp., MSN and Yahoo were a separate company?Microsoft would NEVER spin them off. A wholly owned subsidiary YESMS still wants to be able to convert all of the servers to Windows, and make sure that they do what Microsoft wants in the war against open source. MS...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 08:10:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/msn.html"><![CDATA[MSN]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/yahoo%2521+inc..html"><![CDATA[Yahoo! Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/bungie.html"><![CDATA[Bungie]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/server.html"><![CDATA[server]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">YHOO</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT,YHOO</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[IE team shares ... a version number]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12558-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=41945&messageID=773639&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[IE team shares ... a version numberPut the IE team under ScottGuIE should be moved from the platform group to the client technology group.  If ScottGu were in any way responsible for this team as he should be, he would clean up this mess in no time.  Filthy...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 17:03:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/web+browsers.html"><![CDATA[Web browsers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/team+management.html"><![CDATA[Team management]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+internet+explorer.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/team.html"><![CDATA[team]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ie+team.html"><![CDATA[IE team]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+internet+explorer+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Internet Explorer 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ie8.html"><![CDATA[IE8]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mozilla+firefox.html"><![CDATA[Mozilla Firefox]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ms+just.html"><![CDATA[MS JUST]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Do Microsoft and Google compete?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12694-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=33705&messageID=618939&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Do Microsoft and Google compete?Nice articleI agree with just about everything you say. TBH you're saying nothing new - we all know these facts already but it's soooo much fun watching the MS-Fanboys defend their godhead from any threat no matter how slight.As many posters on these fora have pointed...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 02:51:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ms+just.html"><![CDATA[MS JUST]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/google+inc..html"><![CDATA[Google Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GOOG</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">GOOG,MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Edubuntu update - it freakin' rocks]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12355-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=33622&messageID=617617&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Edubuntu update - it freakin' rocksI'll get back to you, but...In intial testing, performance testing with 2 thin clients running off a P4 Edubuntu server was certainly good enough for basic productivity and web access.  I'll update after a weekend of 4 kids pounding away on 3 thin clients...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 05:26:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/thin+clients.html"><![CDATA[Thin clients]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ms+just.html"><![CDATA[MS JUST]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/thin+client.html"><![CDATA[thin client]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/edubuntu.html"><![CDATA[Edubuntu]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/xubuntu.html"><![CDATA[Xubuntu]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/server.html"><![CDATA[server]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Is Microsoft's Cloud OS actually a Cloud DB?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12558-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=32694&messageID=601484&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Microsoft's Cloud OS actually a Cloud DB?windows 2010 - Windows as a utilityThat's Cloud storage, If I look at Amazon, they have first release storage cloud first (S3), computing came latter (EC2). I hope MS follows the same. Live platform & services, all together would live in the Cloud‘Cloud...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 05:23:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/productivity.html"><![CDATA[PRODUCTIVITY]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/clouddb.html"><![CDATA[CloudDB]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ms+just.html"><![CDATA[MS JUST]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cloud+os.html"><![CDATA[Cloud OS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+system.html"><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[What's a Vista zero-day exploit worth? Try $50K]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=28389&messageID=531073&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[What's a Vista zero-day exploit worth? Try $50KState the obvious! What is the real problem?MS just has to offer more money for pirates to hack OS X and Linux! $1,000,000 a day on offer, just rip into them. Bonuses for each day that it is not patched! What's $365M a...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 07:57:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista+%2528longhorn%2529.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista (Longhorn)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hacking.html"><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ms+just.html"><![CDATA[MS JUST]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/robber.html"><![CDATA[robber]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hacker.html"><![CDATA[hacker]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/zero-day+bug.html"><![CDATA[zero-day bug]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Microsoft, Mozilla downplay browser bug]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-1009-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=21891&messageID=416057&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft, Mozilla downplay browser bugWell, now they are a loving wedded coupleand poor Opera the jealous ex-lover wondering why she can't get browser bug love.  Opera apparently uses protection and is choosey.Surprisingly no comments on the story!!If this story had been only on MS Internet Explorer flaw then by...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 17:45:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/web+browsers.html"><![CDATA[Web browsers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/java.html"><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[SECURITY]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ms+just.html"><![CDATA[MS JUST]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/legal+strategy.html"><![CDATA[Legal Strategy]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mozilla+firefox.html"><![CDATA[Mozilla Firefox]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/web+browser.html"><![CDATA[Web browser]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mozilla+corp..html"><![CDATA[Mozilla Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
