<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[microsoft ooxml Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+ooxml.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to microsoft ooxml]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="5" found="5" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Microsoft's OOXML viewers, translators, SDK to help interop with Firefox, OpenOffice?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=55001&messageID=1039707&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft's OOXML viewers, translators, SDK to help interop with Firefox, OpenOffice?Microsoft announcement URL, pleaseThe link provided in the article text merely jumps to another ZDNet news posting that also fails to provide a link to MS content.It is just that everybody stopped using .docx format, since most people cannot read...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 09:52:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+ooxml.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft OOXML]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/office+open+xml.html"><![CDATA[Office Open XML]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/openoffice.html"><![CDATA[OpenOffice]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sdk.html"><![CDATA[SDK]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mozilla+firefox.html"><![CDATA[Mozilla Firefox]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Microsoft OOXML opponents won't back down]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=48346&messageID=901481&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft OOXML opponents won't back downIt lies with the winner?Microsoft didn't win--it did it's usual thing of lying and cheating to steal a result it couldn't earn.  E.g.,http://deepakphatak.blogspot.com/2008/05/this-is.htmlNot a standard, yetWith the appeals and the lack of publishing, it's still not a standard.OOXML is largely irrelevant and will "die"ISO...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 07:13:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/opendocument+format+%2528odf%2529.html"><![CDATA[OpenDocument Format (ODF)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/office+open+xml.html"><![CDATA[Office Open XML]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/opendocument+format.html"><![CDATA[OpenDocument Format]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Microsoft's OOXML gets ISO approval ... maybe]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=46087&messageID=852343&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft's OOXML gets ISO approval ... maybeFraud and corruption is the new International standard.Congratulations Microsoft for absolutely nothing of value, and enjoy the backlash ;-)Interesting language"[i]Microsoft maintains that Office dominates on the desktop worldwide and that OOXML is a de facto standard anyway[/i]"In other words, MS thinks that whatever they...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 04:20:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/iso+standards.html"><![CDATA[ISO standards]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/process+improvement.html"><![CDATA[Process improvement]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/german+standard.html"><![CDATA[German Standard]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ooxml.html"><![CDATA[OOXML]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/iso.html"><![CDATA[ISO]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+office.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Office]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/irregularity.html"><![CDATA[irregularity]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+ooxml.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft OOXML]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Google scores a win over Microsoft's OOXML]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11470-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=38778&messageID=710924&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Google scores a win over Microsoft's OOXMLHows this a win for google?are google and microsoft competing for the standard? Howz this a win for google over microsoft??. Google has a opinion that OOXML is not worthy of standardization and ISO has taken a decision that is in line with this...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 11:54:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/opendocument+format+%2528odf%2529.html"><![CDATA[OpenDocument Format (ODF)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/opendocument+format.html"><![CDATA[OpenDocument Format]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ooxml.html"><![CDATA[OOXML]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/google+inc..html"><![CDATA[Google Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GOOG</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">GOOG,MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Is Microsoft OOXML the best deal open source can get?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=1178]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[The Microsoft Office formats are in the news again. (Picture from Stephesblog, copyright Hugh MacLeod.)Massachusetts has backed-down and accepted the Microsoft Office OOXML format as a standardÂ while the companies in Microsoft's open source orbit promise they will work together on conversion routines between OOXML and Open Office's ODF.Many in the...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 07:47:12 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/strategy.html"><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/standards.html"><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mass+market.html"><![CDATA[mass market]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/marketing.html"><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/legal.html"><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/government.html"><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/general.html"><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/applications.html"><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
