<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[microsoft licenses Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+licenses.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to microsoft licenses]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="3" found="3" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Microsoft licenses Adobe's FlashLite for Win Mobile phones]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12558-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=45663&messageID=842360&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft licenses Adobe's FlashLite for Win Mobile phonesYay. I'm glad MS has finally done that.It's about time for MS to officially offer support. I wonder how many more years it will take Apple to do the same thing.RE: Microsoft licenses Adobe's FlashLite for Win Mobile phonesWhen MS license other companies...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 09:19:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+licenses+adobe.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft licenses Adobe]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/win+mobile+phone.html"><![CDATA[Win Mobile phone]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+licenses.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Licenses]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/flashlite.html"><![CDATA[FlashLite]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/win+mobile.html"><![CDATA[Win Mobile]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cell+phone.html"><![CDATA[cell phone]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/phone.html"><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Microsoft licenses Adobe's Flash Lite: The motives in a nutshell]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=45640&messageID=842165&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft licenses Adobe's Flash Lite: The motives in a nutshellKeep the thought"In other words, this licensing pact is a merger of convenience that will be irrelevant years from now."  You should be able to use this again and again.Adobe's on the defensivebecause of WHY Apple threw it under the...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 05:53:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advertising+%2526+promotion.html"><![CDATA[Advertising & Promotion]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+licenses+adobe+flash+lite.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft licenses Adobe Flash Lite]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/adobe+systems+inc..html"><![CDATA[Adobe Systems Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+licenses.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Licenses]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mobile.html"><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">ADBE</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">ADBE,MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Was OSI right to let Microsoft licenses in?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=39948&messageID=735758&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Was OSI right to let Microsoft licenses in?I voted "Ok, but I wouldn't use them"I voted "Ok, but I wouldn't use them" because there's already a whole spectrum of open source licenses to choose from(GPL, MIT, BSD, MPL, etc). That's not to say I wouldn't use Ms-PL or Ms-RL licensed...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 21:32:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[OPEN SOURCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+licenses.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Licenses]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/osi.html"><![CDATA[OSI]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
