<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[microsoft lets Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+lets.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to microsoft lets]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Microsoft lets laid-off employees keep overpayments]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12558-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=61180&messageID=1126999&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft lets laid-off employees keep overpaymentsNice to seeI'm not the only one asking why it was 'deserved'.But I guess bashing MS is fashionable, and even Mary-Jo likes the vantage point of the band-wagon. RE: Microsoft lets laid-off employees keep overpaymentsWhy is it well deserved?  Since when is it ok...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:13:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/public+relations.html"><![CDATA[Public relations]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operational+accounting.html"><![CDATA[Operational accounting]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/msoft.html"><![CDATA[Msoft]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/overpayment.html"><![CDATA[overpayment]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+lets.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Lets]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
