<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[medical success Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/medical+success.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to medical success]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Getting paid is key to medical success]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-13593-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=37046&messageID=681084&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Getting paid is key to medical successProcedure vs ConditionPlease raise your hand if you believe we will be able to move from billing at the CPT code level to billing at the ICD-9 level. While I personally believe that both systems impose an artifical taxonomy upon provider and patient, we...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 14:03:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/insurance.html"><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/medical+success.html"><![CDATA[medical success]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/icd-9.html"><![CDATA[ICD-9]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patient.html"><![CDATA[patient]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/billing.html"><![CDATA[billing]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
