<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[mainframe monopoly Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mainframe+monopoly.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to mainframe monopoly]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[IBM accused of mainframe monopoly]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9595-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=56670&messageID=1072726&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[IBM accused of mainframe monopolyLOL!And it's only taken 30 years for someone to recognize that?Besides, what possible point is there in arguing about this now?  They're peripheral to mainstream computing now at best.Sauce for the gooseIf the allegations are substantiated then the law should be enforced on IBM as...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:09:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mainframes.html"><![CDATA[Mainframes]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/servers.html"><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mainframe.html"><![CDATA[mainframe]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mainframe+monopoly.html"><![CDATA[mainframe monopoly]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ibm+corp..html"><![CDATA[IBM Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">IBM</category>
		<category domain="tickers">IBM</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
