<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[life-cycle Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/life-cycle.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to life-cycle]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Wishful thinking: Can we make this carbon clock count backwords?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-13603-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=66141&messageID=1243630&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Wishful thinking: Can we make this carbon clock count backwords?We don't need to make the carbon clock 'count backwards'The fact is that carbon in the atmosphere does LITTLE TO NO damage to the environment in the slightest.We should be more worried about water vapor... but then again, there is nothing...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 07:54:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/life-cycle.html"><![CDATA[Life-cycle]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/carbon.html"><![CDATA[carbon]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/wishful+thinking.html"><![CDATA[WISHFUL THINKING]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
