<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[liability plan Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/liability+plan.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to liability plan]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Open source shrugs at EU liability plans]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=64493&messageID=1199699&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Open source shrugs at EU liability plansI've said it beforeFOSS companies should not worry.Having liabilities for the free speach makes no sense and would violate the constitution.Only propietary companies need to worry about it.RE: Open source shrugs at EU liability plansI agree with Dana; the current "exemption" by many software...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 07:58:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/oss+developer.html"><![CDATA[OSS Developer]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/liability+plan.html"><![CDATA[liability plan]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/precaution.html"><![CDATA[precaution]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/oss.html"><![CDATA[OSS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/f%252foss.html"><![CDATA[F/OSS]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
