<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[lgpl Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/lgpl.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to lgpl]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="7" found="7" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Why I won't use GPLv3 software]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11048-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=34486&messageID=634793&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Why I won't use GPLv3 softwareJohn it depend on witch side of the fence you sitFor some  its microsoft that a nuisance and a dinosaur that should have died long ago ....for some its savage capitalism for some its both GPLv3 is yes a bit extreme but on the...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 10:49:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[OPEN SOURCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/gplv3.html"><![CDATA[GPLv3]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/free+software+foundation.html"><![CDATA[Free Software Foundation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/gpl.html"><![CDATA[GPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/lgpl.html"><![CDATA[LGPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[The CDDL example]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11202-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=34413&messageID=633437&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[The CDDL exampleNow, if we could just replace the GPL with this or the FreeBSD licence...then maybe development would extend from the community to the commercial much further with respect to Linux etc.Communism, sorry, socialism never worked in Mother Russia and it sure doesn't do a damn thing for open...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 00:36:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[OPEN SOURCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sun+microsystems+inc..html"><![CDATA[Sun Microsystems Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/convergence.html"><![CDATA[convergence]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cddl.html"><![CDATA[CDDL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/gpl.html"><![CDATA[GPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/lgpl.html"><![CDATA[LGPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">JAVA</category>
		<category domain="tickers">JAVA</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Children of GPL]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=997]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[In all the hubbub over GPL Version 3, a lot of you may not know this is just one license that the Free Software Foundation manages. (The image stood at the top of Georg Greve's Brave Gnu World columns from 1999-2004.)They also manage the LGPL, or the Lesser GPL. A...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 06:57:35 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software+as+a+service.html"><![CDATA[Software as a Service]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/legal.html"><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/general.html"><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/foss.html"><![CDATA[FOSS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software+licensing.html"><![CDATA[Software Licensing]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/gpl.html"><![CDATA[GPL]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Sun's open-source chief rallies behind GPLv3]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-3513-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=28027&messageID=525787&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Sun's open-source chief rallies behind GPLv3I would love to see Sun release Solaris under GPL3, that would be a goodmove to shake things up and put the spotlight back on Linux Torvalds.But, more practically speaking, it might be better to dual license it under GPL2/GPL3.I will support them either way...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 20:48:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/lgpl.html"><![CDATA[LGPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sun+solaris.html"><![CDATA[Sun Solaris]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sun+microsystems+inc..html"><![CDATA[Sun Microsystems Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/proprietary+code.html"><![CDATA[proprietary code]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/developer.html"><![CDATA[developer]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/gplv3.html"><![CDATA[GPLv3]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">JAVA</category>
		<category domain="tickers">JAVA</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Why Java will be GPL'd]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12353-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=27167&messageID=510890&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Why Java will be GPL'dGawd, anything but the GPL.I can't think of anything that will turn professional developers off faster.How 'bout Humble Pie?;)What about FreeBSD license?I wish FreeBSD http://www.FreeBSD.Org/ can redistribute JDK with it's OS without having the user to download it manually.Thank you,Abdullah[u]http://www.WeArab.Net/]Arab[/u]Powered by [u]http://www.FreeBSD.Org/]FreeBSD Free Unix server OS[/u]Why...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 15:50:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[OPEN SOURCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/programming+languages.html"><![CDATA[Programming languages]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/gpl.html"><![CDATA[GPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/java.html"><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sun+microsystems+inc..html"><![CDATA[Sun Microsystems Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/lgpl.html"><![CDATA[LGPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/gcc.html"><![CDATA[GCC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/freebsd.html"><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/bsd.html"><![CDATA[BSD]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">JAVA</category>
		<category domain="tickers">JAVA</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[New LGPL should work with Java]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Burnette/?p=153]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[In all the fanfare accompanying the 2nd draft of the GNU Public License version 3, one might have overlooked the release of the 1st discussion draft of its little brother, the "Lesser" GPL, or LGPL version 3. Originally called the "Library" GPL, LGPL is important to open source developers because...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 06:12:50 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/lgpl.html"><![CDATA[LGPL]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Covalent launches strike against JBoss with Geronimo]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=17040&messageID=336825&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Covalent launches strike against JBoss with GeronimoJBoss is LGPL, not GPLJBoss is not licensed under the GPL like Linux BTW, but under the LGPL Lesser GPL.I am surprised Mark Brewer propagates such inaccurate statements and I would encourage him to visit our LGPL FAQ (http://www.jboss.com/opensource/lgpl/faq). The LGPL is absolutely fine...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:37:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/java+development+tools.html"><![CDATA[Java development tools]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[OPEN SOURCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/development+tools.html"><![CDATA[Development tools]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/middleware.html"><![CDATA[Middleware]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/lgpl.html"><![CDATA[LGPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/jboss.html"><![CDATA[JBoss]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/covalent+technologies.html"><![CDATA[Covalent Technologies]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/gpl-license.html"><![CDATA[GPL-license]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
