<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[itanic Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/itanic.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to itanic]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="14" found="14" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Bruised Intel focuses forward]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=18615&messageID=361069&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Bruised Intel focuses forwardThey dropped the ball with itanic.The warning signs have been staring intel in the proverbial face for many years, and very obviously over the past couple of years. Their attitude towards AMD that their overconfidence in their own flawed designs is coming round to bite them on...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 05:30:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/notebooks.html"><![CDATA[Notebooks]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advanced+micro+devices+inc..html"><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/itanic.html"><![CDATA[Itanic]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMD</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AMD,INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[A piece of the Itanic story]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11202-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=18262&messageID=355124&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[A piece of the Itanic storyYou left out an important ancestor to this...VAX/VMS also pioneered a lot of the protections you mention, and these were carried forward into the Alpha family of processors. thus it really should be no surprise that OpenVMS has been ported to the ItaniumcheersAgreedYes, the earliest...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:36:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/itanic.html"><![CDATA[Itanic]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Itanium: A cautionary tale]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=15780&messageID=313102&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Itanium: A cautionary talepoor performance per dollarunfortunately everyone has a budget, for the price of a single itanium cpu (1.5Ghz = $1900) you can have a complete entry level dual-core system.History lessonSun became the number one UNIX vendor when they came out with SPARC. One thing they did was to...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 05:09:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+technology.html"><![CDATA[Network technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/epic+architecture.html"><![CDATA[EPIC architecture]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/inhell.html"><![CDATA[Inhell]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chip.html"><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/digital+equipment+corp..html"><![CDATA[Digital Equipment Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/epic.html"><![CDATA[EPIC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/alpha.html"><![CDATA[Alpha]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hewlett-packard+co..html"><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard Co.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hp+pa-risc.html"><![CDATA[HP PA-RISC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/itanic.html"><![CDATA[Itanic]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+itanium.html"><![CDATA[Intel Itanium]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">HPQ</category>
		<category domain="tickers">HPQ</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Itanium alliance backed by major tech companies]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=13709&messageID=274456&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Itanium alliance backed by major tech companiesOdor of death...It's obvious the Itanium is dead when you prod it with the toe of your boot.  Be fun to be a fly on the wall at one of those Itanium developer meetings.  Bet they're talking about anything and everything but...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 16:57:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/public+relations.html"><![CDATA[Public relations]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/strategy.html"><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+itanium.html"><![CDATA[Intel Itanium]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/itanic.html"><![CDATA[Itanic]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/alliance.html"><![CDATA[alliance]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Microsoft limits Longhorn's Itanium job duties]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=13118&messageID=261221&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft limits Longhorn's Itanium job dutiesIt does not matterIf someone needs something more powerful than x86-64 AMD or Xenon chips then they will probably use a RISC platform; running a fax server certainly does not qualify.Itanium has yet to reach some price/performance ratio to make any real difference.Opteron beats Itanium...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 13:42:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista+%2528longhorn%2529.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista (Longhorn)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/job.html"><![CDATA[job]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+itanium.html"><![CDATA[Intel Itanium]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/fax.html"><![CDATA[fax]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+system.html"><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/itanic.html"><![CDATA[Itanic]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+longhorn.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Longhorn]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Meet HP's new CEO Mark Hurd]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10533-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=9286&messageID=185455&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Meet HP's new CEO Mark HurdCan Hurd, herd?Today, HP is a mess. Their reputation and products are declining - as is the morale of the workers. They abdicated their leadership in computer chip technology to InHell - only to become the sole salesmen for the Itanic. Carly had the "initiative...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 05:02:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mark+hurd.html"><![CDATA[Mark Hurd]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hewlett-packard+co..html"><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard Co.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/itanic.html"><![CDATA[Itanic]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mandrake.html"><![CDATA[Mandrake]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">HPQ</category>
		<category domain="tickers">HPQ</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Intel Kool-Aid? x86 not an Itanium success factor]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10533-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=8777&messageID=176118&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel Kool-Aid? x86 not an Itanium success factorThe Itanic hasn't sunk yetbecause its floating in 2 feet of water its market share. InHell specifically added an x86 core to the Itanic for "backward compatability" - yet no one flocked to Itanic. As I said before, when Moore's Law runs out...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 05:04:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+technology.html"><![CDATA[Network technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/itanic.html"><![CDATA[Itanic]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hewlett-packard+co..html"><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard Co.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+x86.html"><![CDATA[Intel x86]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+itanium.html"><![CDATA[Intel Itanium]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">HPQ</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">HPQ,INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Bruce Perens on Carly's ouster]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=8110&messageID=163757&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Bruce Perens on Carly's ousterTells it like it is.The Achilles heel of both HP and Compaq was the blind reliance on Intel. HP and Intel for that matter put billions into Itanic with nothing to show for it. Intel could take it, because they still make monopoly-money profits on the...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2005 14:15:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/outsourcing.html"><![CDATA[Outsourcing]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/itanic.html"><![CDATA[Itanic]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/outsource.html"><![CDATA[outsource]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hewlett-packard+co..html"><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard Co.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+x86.html"><![CDATA[Intel x86]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/bruce+perens.html"><![CDATA[Bruce Perens]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">HPQ</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">HPQ,INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Itanium--one step forward, one back]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=7295&messageID=147541&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Itanium--one step forward, one backThe Itanic is DOA...This piece of crap has three feet in the grave and one on the way. Put the poor thing out of it's misery and bury it for good. It's just another multi BILLION dollar Intel failure. Accept it and move on.specialised chips for...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:58:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/nothing.html"><![CDATA[Nothing]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/x86+architecture.html"><![CDATA[x86 architecture]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/epic.html"><![CDATA[EPIC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+itanium.html"><![CDATA[Intel Itanium]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chip.html"><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/great+architecture.html"><![CDATA[great architecture]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/itanic.html"><![CDATA[Itanic]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/server.html"><![CDATA[server]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[AMD's dual-core performance boost]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=5737&messageID=117834&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[AMD's dual-core performance boostItanic first dual coreThe Itanic processor was the first with a dual core - a PA-RISC core and a Pentium 5 core - on one chip. Quite an odd beast! If you want x86 backward compatability . . .what the heckwhat the heck are you smoking.Heyyyy!!I found...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 04:44:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/dual-core.html"><![CDATA[dual-core]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/dual-core+performance.html"><![CDATA[dual-core performance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/itanic.html"><![CDATA[Itanic]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advanced+micro+devices+inc..html"><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMD</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AMD</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[HP discontinues its Itanium workstations]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=5548&messageID=114155&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[HP discontinues its Itanium workstationsItanium is doneBut its significance is more than that: it will forever be Intel's biggest mistake, the one that gave real birth to AMD's (Opteron's) existence.Not so fast, Jeff . . .. . . This may prove that any one company can no longer foist its...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2004 21:20:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+technology.html"><![CDATA[Network technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/workstation.html"><![CDATA[workstation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hewlett-packard+co..html"><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard Co.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/epic+architecture.html"><![CDATA[EPIC architecture]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+itanium.html"><![CDATA[Intel Itanium]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/alpha.html"><![CDATA[Alpha]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/itanic.html"><![CDATA[Itanic]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/64-bit.html"><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">HPQ</category>
		<category domain="tickers">HPQ</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Itanium not meeting Intel's goals]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=5191&messageID=108313&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Itanium not meeting Intel's goalsthe Itanic is sinking?  go figurewho'da seen that one commingMeeting expectationsThe initial release of the chip fell short of the expectations set by both HP and Intel. Once HP got the old DEC Alpha, Itanium (AKA Uranium, well that's what we're calling it anyhow) should...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2004 19:29:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/servers.html"><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ibm+powerpc.html"><![CDATA[IBM PowerPC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hp-ux+11i+v3.html"><![CDATA[HP-UX 11i V3]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/inhell.html"><![CDATA[Inhell]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+itanium.html"><![CDATA[Intel Itanium]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hewlett-packard+co..html"><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard Co.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/itanic.html"><![CDATA[Itanic]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">HPQ</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">HPQ,INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[End of the line for HP's Alpha]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=4876&messageID=101215&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[End of the line for HP's AlphaMS killed Alpha!!!!Hey, at least MS was mentioned in the story.No tears shed, get rid of themPlease, gid rid of these hardware junkers, we have been liquidating these ancient alphas and buying blades and clustering....They cost millions, run crappy Tru64 garbage.....Good bye and thank...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2004 18:39:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/servers.html"><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/itanic.html"><![CDATA[Itanic]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/alpha+processor.html"><![CDATA[Alpha Processor]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/compaq+tru64+unix.html"><![CDATA[Compaq Tru64 UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/alpha.html"><![CDATA[alpha]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hewlett-packard+co..html"><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard Co.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">HPQ</category>
		<category domain="tickers">HPQ</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Intel changes code name of future Itanium]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=964&messageID=17629&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel changes code name of future ItaniumOK Wakeup ya'llLet's get them names right.  Good grief can ZDnet come up with anymore "so what" stories.  Am I wrong or could that not have gone into the news in brief section.100,000 Titanics sold in 2003 - Sure...The next time Intel...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2003 13:08:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+itanium.html"><![CDATA[Intel Itanium]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/itanic.html"><![CDATA[Itanic]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+inc..html"><![CDATA[Apple Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AAPL</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AAPL,INTC</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
