<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[internet dating Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet+dating.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to internet dating]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[The erosion of anonymous Internet speech]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9595-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=17071&messageID=337291&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[The erosion of anonymous Internet speechvague?I'm not a lawyer but don't I remeber hearing something about laws being declared unconstitutional for being "vague" or "unconstitutionally broad"?Wouldn't any law banning public speech or publishing simply because someone found said speech "annoying" be the poster child for such a case.Let's face it,...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:20:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet+dating.html"><![CDATA[Internet Dating]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet.html"><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
