<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[intel speedstep Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+speedstep.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to intel speedstep]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="3" found="3" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Microsoft wants to help you speed up Vista]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=43736&messageID=809264&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft wants to help you speed up VistaHave to disagree with the missing tip.I've never had to re-install Windows. I ran Windows 2000 until January 2007 without a single re-install. My Vista system has been running fine without a re-install. My work XP system is on its original install.If you...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:55:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista+%2528longhorn%2529.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista (Longhorn)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/branding.html"><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+speedstep.html"><![CDATA[Intel SpeedStep]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/brand+name.html"><![CDATA[brand name]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/registry.html"><![CDATA[registry]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Transmeta sues Intel for patent infringement]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=26160&messageID=491358&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Transmeta sues Intel for patent infringementthis is extorsionTransmeta has been nothing but a bungling set of jokers. Their chips went as fast as a bullock cart when it came to performance. Over the years all their attempts to improve performance were failures. Intel has got cash. This is just a...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 17:35:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+speedstep.html"><![CDATA[Intel SpeedStep]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/transmeta+corp..html"><![CDATA[Transmeta Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patent.html"><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">TMTA</category>
		<category domain="tickers">INTC,TMTA</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[AMD works to chill out Opteron]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=6857&messageID=138161&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[AMD works to chill out OpteronGood move but...If you're really interested in Power and space saving, it's more interesting to virtualise servers.Having 3 or 4 virtual servers running on one hardware box is more interesting if the usual load for those virtual servers is not too high.Naturally, throtteling down cpu...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2004 23:39:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/virtualization.html"><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/productivity.html"><![CDATA[PRODUCTIVITY]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/please+let.html"><![CDATA[Please Let]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/fast+system.html"><![CDATA[FAST System]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advanced+micro+devices+inc..html"><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/server.html"><![CDATA[server]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+speedstep.html"><![CDATA[Intel SpeedStep]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cpu.html"><![CDATA[CPU]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/computer.html"><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/amd+opteron.html"><![CDATA[AMD Opteron]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMD</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AMD</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
