<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[intel pentium m Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium+m.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to intel pentium m]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="20" found="23" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Laptop makers mobilize Pentium-M models]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=25217&messageID=473243&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Laptop makers mobilize Pentium-M modelsGateway laptop batteryI bought a replacement battery for my Gateway laptop about a month ago from www.laptopsforless.com and it works great. Is there any reason to think that a replacement Gateway laptop battery would be any less reliable than the manufacturers? My concern is the laptop...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:25:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/notebooks.html"><![CDATA[Notebooks]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/engineering.html"><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/laptop+computer.html"><![CDATA[laptop computer]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/gateway+laptop.html"><![CDATA[Gateway Laptop]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/gateway+inc..html"><![CDATA[Gateway Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/battery.html"><![CDATA[battery]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium+m.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium M]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GTW</category>
		<category domain="tickers">GTW</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[How AMD plans to counter the Intel Conroe?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=21998&messageID=418114&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[How AMD plans to counter the Intel Conroe?Honestly, I think AMD is in trouble.I may be wrong so lets wait and see.Which market?If you're talking about commodity desktops, it's been a cost-dominated environment for a long time and, frankly, AMD doesn't have the capacity to serve more than a fraction...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:13:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/two-way+server.html"><![CDATA[Two-way server]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium+m.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium M]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/only+problem.html"><![CDATA[Only Problem]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advanced+micro+devices+inc..html"><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMD</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AMD,INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Blueado Mini m5e]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://review.zdnet.com/product/desktops/blueado-mini-m5e/31826811]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Boutique computer manufacturer Blueado focuses on Media Centers, producing several models aimed at high-end home-theater customers. Most of its systems are large, rack-style boxes, but the $1,500 Blueado Mini m5e is a small-form-factor SFF PC that's roughly the size of two Mac Minis stacked end to end. If you're looking...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Product reviews]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 20:09:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/media+center+pcs.html"><![CDATA[Media Center PCs]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/desktops.html"><![CDATA[Desktops]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/consumer+electronics.html"><![CDATA[Consumer electronics]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tv+%2526+home+theater.html"><![CDATA[TV & Home Theater]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blueado+mini.html"><![CDATA[Blueado Mini]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium+m.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium M]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/video.html"><![CDATA[video]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[IDF signals the beginning of a new era for Intel]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=169]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[When Intel launched the P7 family of microprocessors six years ago using the NetBurst microarchitecture, it gambled on a long pipeline (initially 20 stages and later 31 stages) architecture in exchange for high clock rates.  While many today are declaring the NetBurst obsolete and a failure, they're only half...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 00:49:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Analyst firm offers rosy view of Itanium]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=17717&messageID=348550&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Analyst firm offers rosy view of ItaniumI didn't realize that the Itanium sucked for so long.Man is that processor a Piece of Crap.  Apparently Intel hasn't had a good design of the processor since the Pentium.  The exception being the Pentium M.IDC = Itanium Defence Club!!!IDC said back...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 05:38:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+itanium.html"><![CDATA[Intel Itanium]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advanced+micro+devices+inc..html"><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium+m.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium M]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMD</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AMD</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Bidding adieu to Pentium M]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=16233&messageID=321134&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Bidding adieu to Pentium MMisspellingLikewise!  I think you mean you're which is the contraction of you are.  Your is the possessive, that I have seen misused for you're before, but this is the first time I have seen your're.because its not speedIts frequency, not speed.  It tells...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 04:17:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+technology.html"><![CDATA[Network technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium+m.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium M]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processing+power.html"><![CDATA[processing power]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chip.html"><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/clock+speed.html"><![CDATA[clock speed]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Photo: Mac Mini-size Voodoo PC]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://content.zdnet.com/2346-9595_22-14025.html]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Voodoo Computers' Idol is roughly the same size and shape as Apple's Mac Mini, but it runs on an Intel Pentium M processor.]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Image galleries]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 02:46:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/desktops.html"><![CDATA[Desktops]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+mac+mini.html"><![CDATA[Apple Mac Mini]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/voodoo.html"><![CDATA[Voodoo]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium+m.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium M]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/photograph.html"><![CDATA[photograph]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+macintosh.html"><![CDATA[Apple Macintosh]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processor.html"><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+computer+inc..html"><![CDATA[Apple Computer Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pc.html"><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/computer.html"><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Photo: Mac Mini-size Voodoo PC]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://content.zdnet.com/2346-9595_22-21839.html]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Voodoo Computers' Idol is roughly the same size and shape as Apple's Mac Mini, but it runs on an Intel Pentium M processor.]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Image galleries]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 02:46:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/desktops.html"><![CDATA[Desktops]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+mac+mini.html"><![CDATA[Apple Mac Mini]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/voodoo.html"><![CDATA[Voodoo]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium+m.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium M]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/photograph.html"><![CDATA[photograph]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+macintosh.html"><![CDATA[Apple Macintosh]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processor.html"><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+computer+inc..html"><![CDATA[Apple Computer Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pc.html"><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/computer.html"><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[The new Mac mini PC clone]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=110]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Tomshardware is reporting that Aopen will bring the first Mac mini PC clone to the market this Christmas.  This isn't really a big surprise since Aopen was showing this off at Computex back in May.  The big question was if Aopen could match the price point of the...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:48:51 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mini-pc.html"><![CDATA[mini-PC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/aopen.html"><![CDATA[AOpen]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Intel to detail new chips at conference]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=12562&messageID=250544&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel to detail new chips at conferenceIntel now plays "catch up" to AMDWe have used the AMD platform almost exclusively for several years.  It thrills me now to see the smug cpu giant toppled in a way that only mean better consumer pricing.Way to go AMD!More cobbled crap from...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 04:08:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chip.html"><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/netburst.html"><![CDATA[NetBurst]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium+m.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium M]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/inhell.html"><![CDATA[Inhell]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advanced+micro+devices+inc..html"><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/amd+has.html"><![CDATA[AMD HAS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMD</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AMD,INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[AMD power usage trumps Intel -- but does anyone care?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=12315&messageID=246300&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[AMD power usage trumps Intel -- but does anyone care?I care, and the Pentium M is Intel's secret weaponJoel,Nice work and thanks for that link which measures CPU power consumption.  I'll have to see if they include Pentium M numbers.I do have a comment.  You're absolutely right that...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2005 11:27:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/servers.html"><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pentium+m+architecture.html"><![CDATA[Pentium M architecture]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advanced+micro+devices+inc..html"><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium+m.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium M]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processor.html"><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMD</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AMD,INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[How a chill-pill for your server room improves your bottom line]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=12201&messageID=243610&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[How a chill-pill for your server room improves your bottom line3rd time is a charmThe StrongARM processor was the first chip to be engineered to use less power. Although Mr. Ellison's network computer never flew, the last of the Apple Newtons were fantastic devices! Its a testament to ARM's design...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 05:04:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+technology.html"><![CDATA[Network technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/van.html"><![CDATA[van]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chip.html"><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium+m.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium M]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/transmeta+corp..html"><![CDATA[Transmeta Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/32-bit.html"><![CDATA[32-bit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sossaman.html"><![CDATA[Sossaman]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cpu.html"><![CDATA[CPU]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/server.html"><![CDATA[server]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">TMTA</category>
		<category domain="tickers">INTC,TMTA</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Intel to borrow from laptops for server chips]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=12169&messageID=242959&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel to borrow from laptops for server chipsfinally, they are on the right trackAfter the lessons learned from Itanium's low adoption and x86-64's integration they are on the right track.Now can they get the chipset / FSB architecture to boast a clear advantage over hypertransport they may actually get some...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:51:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/servers.html"><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/amd+opteron.html"><![CDATA[AMD Opteron]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chip.html"><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/laptop+computer.html"><![CDATA[laptop computer]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium+m.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium M]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advanced+micro+devices+inc..html"><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/server.html"><![CDATA[server]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMD</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AMD,INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[AMD responds to ZDNet reader's inquiry]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=11744&messageID=233878&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[AMD responds to ZDNet reader's inquiryChipset preferences"my fellow blogger George Ou says he has a preference for Broadcom-based devices".In the past, I've preferred Broadcom or Atheros because they offered 802.11g or 802.11 a/b/g when Intel did not.  Currently, the Intel wireless chipset has caught up in this regard with...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 16:15:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipsets.html"><![CDATA[Chipsets]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advanced+micro+devices+inc..html"><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium+m.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium M]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mt+tdp.html"><![CDATA[MT TDP]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/amd+turion.html"><![CDATA[AMD Turion]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/thermal+design+power.html"><![CDATA[Thermal Design Power]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pentium+m+1.4+ghz.html"><![CDATA[Pentium M 1.4 GHz]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMD</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AMD,INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Chiming in on Centrino]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10533-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=11710&messageID=233219&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Chiming in on CentrinoPC mag Does Not seem To Agree With Your Eval Of CentrinoMultimedia Notebooks: Editors' Choices By Cisco Cheng Mainstream: HP Pavilion dv4000CentrinoHigh-end: Toshiba Qosmio G25-AV513CentrinoMini: Toshiba libretto U100Centrinohttp://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1829666,00.asp27 watts again?According to the Tom's Hardware review you cited, the Pentium M system sucks 112 watts at idle.what is...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 12:38:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+centrino.html"><![CDATA[Intel Centrino]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium+m.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium M]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Apple sold to Intel to defeat Microsoft?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=70]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[When I posted this blog on Wednesday about Mac disciples' reluctance to embrace Intel, I couldn't have imagined that Robert Cringely of PBS would have fallen in to the same trap the very next day.   Apparently, Cringely is speculating that Steve Jobs' ultimate goal is to sell Apple...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 03:23:38 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advanced+micro+devices+inc..html"><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMD</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AMD,INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Mac disciples reluctant to embrace Intel]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=69]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[For some in the Mac community, it will take longer than others to undo a decade's worth of brainwashing by Steve Jobs and Company that the PowerPC is a superior CPU.  Had I dared to suggest, just one week ago, that their precious G4 and G5 was inferior to...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2005 02:47:08 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/steve+jobs.html"><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium+m.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium M]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Intel spills beans on Yonah, the next notebook chip]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=10871&messageID=216361&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel spills beans on Yonah, the next notebook chipWasn't Yonah swalloed by the whale in that old story?Intel's next chip is likely going to be based from the Pentium-M, a a quaint adapter made for older P4 boards (865/875 chipsets) can use the Pentium-M and run at speeds much more...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 14:41:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+technology.html"><![CDATA[Network technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/notebook+chip.html"><![CDATA[notebook chip]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/notebook.html"><![CDATA[notebook]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/yonah.html"><![CDATA[Yonah]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium+m.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium M]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/64-bit.html"><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advanced+micro+devices+inc..html"><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium+4.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium 4]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chip.html"><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMD</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AMD,INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Intel releases new leader of Pentium M pack]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=6030&messageID=122704&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel releases new leader of Pentium M packSOS, DDInHell has stopped the "megahurts" race cause their crap won't scale, and it HURT them to admit it by cancelling the flame throwing, ill fated, Pig 4, 4. Gig. I'm sure Centrino owners have been anxiously waiting a move from 2.0 Gig....]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:30:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+technology.html"><![CDATA[Network technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium+m.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium M]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/inhell.html"><![CDATA[Inhell]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/leader.html"><![CDATA[leader]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Intel sneaks out a low-end Pentium M]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=4270&messageID=88602&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel sneaks out a low-end Pentium MGreat.  Lets confuse the market even moreIntel's new scheme for processors does nothing but CONFUSE people.  But then again, maybe that's the point.  It makes them less comparable, directly, to AMD.The sure scheme sure hasn't done anything to help consumers...Marketplace ConfusionThis...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 05:59:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium+m.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium M]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">INTC</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
