<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[intel nehalem Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+nehalem.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to intel nehalem]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="8" found="8" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[IBM revamps server lineup based on Intel's Nehalem]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=62665&messageID=1156302&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[IBM revamps server lineup based on Intel's NehalemI hate the "X" time better statements ....I hate these nebulous "better" statements without any information to back them up.For a respectable company these sound like soap sales fluff wihtout substance.(Hint:  It makes it sound like you are either lying or covering...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:23:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/server+lineup.html"><![CDATA[server lineup]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+nehalem.html"><![CDATA[Intel Nehalem]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ibm+corp..html"><![CDATA[IBM Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/server.html"><![CDATA[server]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">IBM</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">IBM,INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[How Intel's Nehalem will benefit AMD]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11202-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=54369&messageID=1027950&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[How Intel's Nehalem will benefit AMDinteresting Paul...I hope you are right. I'd like to see AMD coming back to life. I personally don't care too much if Intel stays ahead of Intel. What I would like is that AMD becomes able to offer a good price/value product. Until now, AMD...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 01:22:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/desktops.html"><![CDATA[Desktops]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/benefit.html"><![CDATA[benefit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/xenon.html"><![CDATA[Xenon]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advanced+micro+devices+inc..html"><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+nehalem.html"><![CDATA[Intel Nehalem]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/desktop.html"><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMD</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AMD,INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Intel's Nehalem gets a new name]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12690-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=51599&messageID=970097&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel's Nehalem gets a new nameBecause Intel screwed up with VistaIntel, going from good guy to stinkers, twisting weak Microsoft's arm and screwing us generally with 'underperforming chips' for Vista owe us ...So, to redeem themselves, initial Core i7 processors in production in the fourth quarter will be at 3.2GHz...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 23:18:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+vista+%2528longhorn%2529.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows Vista (Longhorn)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+nehalem.html"><![CDATA[Intel Nehalem]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[The news on Intel's Nehalem; chips with integrated GPUs up next]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12690-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=51081&messageID=959003&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[The news on Intel's Nehalem; chips with integrated GPUs up nextCould Care Less About IntelAMD is better in overall performance and quality, and you can overclock them as well.I can't wait for AMD's info in Deneb.You may not trust a Chinese for measuring power consumption but...http://www.techpowerup.com/index.php?68203:D :D :DCan't wait!!! :DI...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:53:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advanced+micro+devices+inc..html"><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+nehalem.html"><![CDATA[Intel Nehalem]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/gpu.html"><![CDATA[GPU]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chip.html"><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMD</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AMD,INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Podcast: Intel's Nehalem, MS Communicator 7, multi-headed apps and more...]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=32110&messageID=591894&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Podcast: Intel's Nehalem, MS Communicator 7, multi-headed apps and more...What a waste of timeTuned in to listen to what I thought would be interesting but was very disappointed - your guest was an idiot who seemed unable to concentrate of the subject at hand - if I wanted to listen...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 11:37:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/podcasts.html"><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ms+communicator.html"><![CDATA[MS Communicator]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ms+communicator+7.html"><![CDATA[MS Communicator 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+nehalem.html"><![CDATA[Intel Nehalem]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/podcast.html"><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">INTC,MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Podcast: Intel's Nehalem, MS Communicator 7, multi-headed apps and more...]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=4751]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[This week on the Dan & David Show, we talk about Intels next generation 45-nanometer Nehalem chip, which includes an integrated memory controller a la AMDs processor architecture, and Microsofts Communicator 7 suite, which David thinks is a good reason to buy into the Windows platform. We also discuss how...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 20:42:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/podcasts.html"><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/podcast.html"><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+nehalem.html"><![CDATA[Intel Nehalem]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsofts.html"><![CDATA[Microsofts]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">INTC,MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Intel's Nehalem processor: Biggest leap since the Pentium Pro]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=31946&messageID=588914&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel's Nehalem processor: Biggest leap since the Pentium ProMan, Intel just keeps dumping on AMDGlad I don't have any AMD stock...Yet another vaporware 'release'...Intel is yet again trying to freeze the market in anticipation of losing more market share in the 4 socket market.  Octal core?  They keep...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:47:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+core+duo.html"><![CDATA[Intel Core Duo]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/memory+controller.html"><![CDATA[memory controller]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advanced+micro+devices+inc..html"><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/integrated+memory+controller.html"><![CDATA[integrated memory controller]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/imc.html"><![CDATA[IMC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+nehalem.html"><![CDATA[Intel Nehalem]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processor.html"><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium+pro.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium Pro]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMD</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AMD,INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Intel's Nehalem processor: Biggest leap since the Pentium Pro]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=4748]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[At a press gathering this morning, Pat Gelsinger, senior vice president and general manager of Intels Digital Enterprise Group, revealed details about a next generation processor, Nehalem, which brings an entirely new microarchitecture and motherboards, and will include onboard memory and graphics controllers. Nehalem-based desktop, server and mobile processors and...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:01:52 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium+pro.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium Pro]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+pentium.html"><![CDATA[Intel Pentium]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pat+gelsinger.html"><![CDATA[Pat Gelsinger]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+nehalem.html"><![CDATA[Intel Nehalem]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processor.html"><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">INTC</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
