<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[intel larrabee Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+larrabee.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to intel larrabee]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="5" found="5" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Intel Larrabee to have 32 cores, ship in 2010]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-13615-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=64620&messageID=1202500&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel Larrabee to have 32 cores, ship in 2010That's going to take some juice to runOrder my nuclear reactor nowRE: Intel Larrabee to have 32 cores, ship in 2010Nvidea already has 128 cores.But can it do Crysis at better than 5 FPS? nt.Everything's relative 32 Cores sounds impressive until you...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 09:46:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/video+cards.html"><![CDATA[Video cards]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/productivity.html"><![CDATA[PRODUCTIVITY]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/games.html"><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hardware+people.html"><![CDATA[Hardware people]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+larrabee.html"><![CDATA[Intel Larrabee]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/larabee.html"><![CDATA[Larabee]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hardware.html"><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Intel Larrabee to have 32 cores, ship in 2010]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/gadgetreviews/?p=4336]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel has hinted to its plans for its multiple-core Larrabee graphics processor, showing a design that uses 32 processor cores and mates each to its "own vector math unit, allowing each core to process very specialized tasks very efficiently," according to Electronista.    The news was revealed at...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 04:46:40 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+larrabee.html"><![CDATA[Intel Larrabee]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipsets.html"><![CDATA[Chipsets]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/leadership.html"><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hardware.html"><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/components.html"><![CDATA[Components]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/management.html"><![CDATA[Management]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/andrew+nusca.html"><![CDATA[Andrew Nusca]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[NVIDIA responds to Intel's Larrabee GPU]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11408-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=50832&messageID=954246&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[NVIDIA responds to Intel's Larrabee GPUCISC and RISC.I have wondered how Intel proposed to scale their CISC x86 instruction set up to more than a few cores. They can only do this by reducing the complexity of each core, and use less transistors. That means dropping all the clever stuff...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:29:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/nvidia+corp..html"><![CDATA[NVidia Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+larrabee.html"><![CDATA[Intel Larrabee]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/gpu.html"><![CDATA[GPU]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+larrabee+gpu.html"><![CDATA[Intel Larrabee GPU]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/graphics.html"><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">NVDA</category>
		<category domain="tickers">INTC,NVDA</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Intel Larrabee - Will it be AMD/ATI or NVIDIA that gets squeezed the most?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=50445&messageID=946458&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel Larrabee - Will it be AMD/ATI or NVIDIA that gets squeezed the most?Intel will have to prove their metal...in the video arena.  I find it hard to believe they can cut it there.Definitely nVidia.AMD has their own platform in terms of processor and GPU.  nVidia does not....]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 11:30:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipsets.html"><![CDATA[Chipsets]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+graphics.html"><![CDATA[Intel Graphics]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/nvidia+corp..html"><![CDATA[NVidia Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+larrabee.html"><![CDATA[Intel Larrabee]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/amd%252fati.html"><![CDATA[AMD/ATi]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">NVDA</category>
		<category domain="tickers">INTC,NVDA</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Not your father's Intel Architecture]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/processors/?p=116]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel is using this weeks Intel Developer Forum in Beijing to show the new direction in which it is taking its processors. The chipmaker has begun to shift away from designing and manufacturing monolithic or single function chips. Instead, it has begun to create silicon that pairs its Intel Architecture...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 06:49:50 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/uncategorized.html"><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/servers.html"><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductor+architecture.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductor architecture]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/power+conservation.html"><![CDATA[Power conservation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/multicore+processors.html"><![CDATA[multicore processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel.html"><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/data+centers.html"><![CDATA[Data centers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/amd.html"><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
