<![CDATA[indemnification Resources | ZDNet]]> en-us <![CDATA[Red Hat lawyer is right about indemnification not mattering. But for the wrong reasons]]> Mon, 06 Nov 2006 11:23:06 -0800 <![CDATA[Does open source indemnification still matter?]]> Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:52:00 -0700 <![CDATA[Does open source indemnification still matter?]]> Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:44:51 -0700 <![CDATA[Could more Eolas-like open source benefactors hurt Microsoft, others?]]> Tue, 30 May 2006 09:47:47 -0700 JAVA JAVA <![CDATA[Sun releases OpenSolaris file system]]> Thu, 17 Nov 2005 12:51:00 -0800 JAVA JAVA <![CDATA[JBoss indemnifies. But does it really matter?]]> Tue, 05 Apr 2005 13:05:22 -0700 <![CDATA[Indemnification Becomes Open Source’s Nightmare and Microsoft’s Blessing]]> Fri, 01 Apr 2005 00:00:00 -0800 MSFT MSFT <![CDATA[IP indemnification more than an open source issue, says IDC]]> Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:06:09 -0800 <![CDATA[Novell offers legal protection for Linux]]> Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:12:00 -0800 NOVL SCOX Q NOVL,SCOX Q <![CDATA[IBM should assume software risks]]> Mon, 27 Oct 2003 05:43:00 -0800 HPQ IBM SCOX Q HPQ,IBM,SCOX Q