<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[id10t Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/id10t.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to id10t]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="2" found="2" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Red tape keeps Conficker on medical devices]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9595-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=64167&messageID=1192250&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Red tape keeps Conficker on medical devicesAnd of course we [i]want[/i] the governmentto run healthcare? If they are interfereng with routine patching due to their regulations, then having those regulations interfere with fixing the issues the regulations caused, maybe it is time they stepped aside and let the staff maintaine...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 13:32:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/healthcare.html"><![CDATA[HEALTHCARE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/storage+management.html"><![CDATA[Storage management]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/red+tape.html"><![CDATA[Red Tape]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/conficker.html"><![CDATA[Conficker]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/medical+device.html"><![CDATA[medical device]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/data+set.html"><![CDATA[data set]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/regulation.html"><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Law turns tables on anti-spam group]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-1009-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=3739&messageID=77357&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Law turns tables on anti-spam groupPoor SpammersWhat a joke. I guess the spammers don't realize WHY ISP's, end-users, and corporations use a DNS blacklist. I have never heard of anyone complaining that they aren't getting enough spam.Any spammer that complains or sues should be slapped. Twice.Somewhat Off-Topic, but......have any Webmasters...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2004 07:27:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet+service+providers+%2528isps%2529.html"><![CDATA[Internet service providers (ISPs)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/spam.html"><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/id10t.html"><![CDATA[ID10T]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/anti-spam.html"><![CDATA[anti-spam]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/spamhaus.html"><![CDATA[Spamhaus]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/spammer.html"><![CDATA[spammer]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/e-mail.html"><![CDATA[e-mail]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/violence.html"><![CDATA[violence]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet+service+provider.html"><![CDATA[Internet Service Provider]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
