<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[high court Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/high+court.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to high court]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="5" found="5" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[High court wrestles with software patent questions]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9595-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=30474&messageID=566075&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[High court wrestles with software patent questionsGood,now Steve can leave Linux alone!Chief Justice Roberts...... should sell his Microsoft stock.  A Supreme Court vote on essential issues to a major industry shouldn't be nullified.  And many software issues involve Microsoft.Logic.So whether software should be patented is not relevant to...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:52:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tools+%2526+techniques.html"><![CDATA[Tools & Techniques]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/high+court.html"><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patent.html"><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software.html"><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/oem.html"><![CDATA[OEM]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/at%2526t+corp..html"><![CDATA[AT&T Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">T</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">T,MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[High court skips Falwell Web site case]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9595-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=19980&messageID=384684&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[High court skips Falwell Web site caseSnow shovels selling like hotcakes in hellWow. Trademark law being intepereted corretly by the courts?! Who would have thought. What's next, a budget suplus by the federal government?And Some Thought Only Legals Could Have Web SitesI have seen this advice regarding web sites way...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:56:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/channel+management.html"><![CDATA[Channel management]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/web+site+development.html"><![CDATA[Web site development]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/web+technology.html"><![CDATA[Web technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/web.html"><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/web+site.html"><![CDATA[Web site]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/web+page.html"><![CDATA[Web page]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/high+court.html"><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[High court declines media ownership appeals]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9595-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=11108&messageID=221507&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[High court declines media ownership appealsThe airwaves belong to the people,not the broadcasting companies.  They merely license space from the American people.  Nice to see the Supreme Court backing up our rights, our ability to get a variety of viewpoints and hopefully a clearer picture of the truth...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:51:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/federal+government.html"><![CDATA[Federal government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advertising+%2526+promotion.html"><![CDATA[Advertising & Promotion]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/gannet.html"><![CDATA[Gannet]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/fcc.html"><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/clearer+picture.html"><![CDATA[clearer picture]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/government+involvement.html"><![CDATA[government involvement]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/american+people.html"><![CDATA[American People]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/airwave.html"><![CDATA[airwave]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/high+court.html"><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[High court to rule on Net wine sales]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-3513-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=3492&messageID=72003&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[High court to rule on Net wine salesAmendment XXI, Section 2.http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.amendmentxxi.htmlWhile I disagree with it, the amendment clearly gives states the right to regulate the importation of alcohol.Anyone who wants to support a Constitutional amendment to repeal that has my support, but the ends do not jusitify the means, and...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2004 11:26:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/wine+sale.html"><![CDATA[wine sale]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/high+court.html"><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/wine.html"><![CDATA[wine]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[High court turns deaf ear to Aimster]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-3513-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=1211&messageID=23532&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[High court turns deaf ear to AimsterAimster provided no evidenceWell I would have hoped that someone would have looked at the files for download and figure out what % copyrighted vs. publiv domain or free files with no restrictions. I think U.S. courts in some cases don't see that these...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:06:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/aimster.html"><![CDATA[Aimster]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/high+court.html"><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
