<![CDATA[health-it Resources | ZDNet]]> en-us <![CDATA[Microsoft wins seat at health IT table]]> Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:45:00 -0700 MSFT MSFT <![CDATA[Canada scandal illustrates perils of health IT stimulus]]> Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:38:00 -0700 <![CDATA[A call to mainstream health IT]]> Wed, 05 Aug 2009 13:10:00 -0700 <![CDATA[Do security and privacy make health IT reform impossible?]]> Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:45:00 -0700 <![CDATA[Can contractors be part of health IT reform?]]> Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:06:00 -0700 <![CDATA[Will health IT go to the usual suspects?]]> Thu, 28 May 2009 17:56:00 -0700 GE GE <![CDATA[Will Obama surrender to health IT lobby?]]> Thu, 21 May 2009 11:40:00 -0700 <![CDATA[Why it is always 1986 in health IT]]> Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:56:00 -0700 <![CDATA[Should health IT be immune from suits]]> Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:49:00 -0700 <![CDATA[Proprietary advantage the argument against health IT?]]> Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:17:00 -0700 <![CDATA[Obama chooses a policy wonk to head health IT]]> Fri, 20 Mar 2009 07:05:00 -0700 <![CDATA[Who will control the coming health IT standards?]]> Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:15:00 -0800 <![CDATA[HL7 wants fewer standards, more patience on health IT]]> Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:33:00 -0800 <![CDATA[Waiting on a health IT czar]]> Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:59:00 -0800 MSFT MSFT <![CDATA[Will health IT be Obama version of the Iraq War]]> Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:49:00 -0800 <![CDATA[Will health IT push back against populist Luddism?]]> Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:13:00 -0800 <![CDATA[Commonwealth Fund makes big push for health IT]]> Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:38:00 -0800 <![CDATA[Microsoft endorses standards for health IT]]> Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:18:00 -0800 MSFT MSFT <![CDATA[$20 billion is the number on health IT stimulus]]> Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:13:00 -0800 <![CDATA[Will govt throw bucks at health IT without understanding the goals?]]> Thu, 15 Jan 2009 20:19:00 -0800