<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[goodmail Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/goodmail.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to goodmail]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="7" found="7" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Good email can take the ISP fast lane]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12689-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=35389&messageID=651431&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Good email can take the ISP fast laneIt's the bulk, actuallyGoodMail's main "product" appears to be a sort of "Good Housekeeping Mark of Approval" for "good bulk mail."Individual senders aren't really relevant.  If an individual sender could get GoodMailed by virtue of sending through his ISP's mail servers the...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:41:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet+service+providers+%2528isps%2529.html"><![CDATA[Internet service providers (ISPs)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/goodmail.html"><![CDATA[Goodmail]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/e-mail.html"><![CDATA[e-mail]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Good email can take the ISP fast lane]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/ecommunity/?p=138]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Comcast, Cox Communications, Time Warner Cable's Road Runner and Verizon have joined Yahoo and AOL in adopting theÂ CertifiedMail reputation program from Goodmail Systems.Courtesy ofÂ Slashdot's "something-to-think-about dept," CmdrTaco asksÂ What Happens If You Don't Pay for Goodmail?Â Â (Read CmdrTaco's blog for an objective analysis ofÂ both sides of the debate.)Â [Here's] the Catch 22: If...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:45:28 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/spam.html"><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/messaging.html"><![CDATA[Messaging]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/email+marketing.html"><![CDATA[email marketing]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/email.html"><![CDATA[Email]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Leading ISPs sign up for Goodmail antispam service]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9588-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=34739&messageID=638875&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Leading ISPs sign up for Goodmail antispam serviceIt's sad that it has come down to thisWhile this may come off as another email scam, this might actually be the best solution when it comes to the next level of email assurance. The only problem with this is that the more...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 09:52:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet+service+providers+%2528isps%2529.html"><![CDATA[Internet service providers (ISPs)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cyberthreats.html"><![CDATA[Cyberthreats]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/anti-spam.html"><![CDATA[anti-spam]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/goodmail.html"><![CDATA[Goodmail]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/e-mail.html"><![CDATA[e-mail]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/spam.html"><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/spammer.html"><![CDATA[spammer]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet+service+provider.html"><![CDATA[Internet Service Provider]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[EFF's sender pay email debate ends in draw]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=2903]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night Mitch Kapor, Esther Dyson and Danny O&rsquo;Brien debated the pros and cons of sender-pay email at a fundraiser for the Electronic Frontier Foundation held at the Roxie Film Center in the Mission district. Actually Mitch was the moderator, but the co-founder of EFF and Chair of the Open...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 12:49:53 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/electronic+frontier+foundation.html"><![CDATA[Electronic Frontier Foundation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/goodmail.html"><![CDATA[Goodmail]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/e-mail.html"><![CDATA[e-mail]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Craig Newmark's modest anti-spam proposal]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=2765]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Craigslist's Craig Newmark weighs in on the recent anti-spam/phishing debate. The Goodmail/AOL proposal, which Esther Dyson has written about, is built around a pay-to-send email certification scheme. The DearAOL Coalition rejects it as an "email tax." Here's what Craig proposes on his blog:Here's what seems to be a great alternative...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 17:32:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/e-mail.html"><![CDATA[e-mail]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/goodmail%252faol.html"><![CDATA[Goodmail/AOL]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[What Esther really said about Goodmail]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=2756]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[I posted on Monday about the DearAOL coalition's take on Esther Dyson's New York Times op-ed column on Goodmail's CertifiedEmail approach to fighting spam, and Esther's follow up response. In an email, Esther further explained her viewpoint and where DearAOL miscued:I never got the courtesy of a reply from the...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:29:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/goodmail.html"><![CDATA[Goodmail]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/dearaol+coalition.html"><![CDATA[DearAOL Coalition]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/esther.html"><![CDATA[Esther]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[DearAOL.com coalition tangles with Esther Dyson over Goodmail's CertifiedEmail approach to spam eradication]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=2737]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[On Friday, Esther Dyson wrote a New York Times op-ed piece, &ldquo;You've Got Goodmail,&rdquo; in which she advocated for Goodmail Systems&rsquo; freedom to pursue a 'certified' approach to dealing with the  problem of spam and fraud on the Internet. She wrote:What Goodmail is proposing is a sort of FedEx...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:26:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/goodmail.html"><![CDATA[Goodmail]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
