<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[good worm Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/good+worm.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to good worm]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="2" found="2" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Can good worms solve the Conficker problem?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12353-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=63099&messageID=1166594&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Can good worms solve the Conficker problem?Can good worms solve the Conficker problem?I like the idea in theory but then you are doubling worm traffic due to the good guys fighting the bad guys. One way around that is to have a worm kill switch to kill it once all...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:48:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cyberthreats.html"><![CDATA[Cyberthreats]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/viruses+and+worms.html"><![CDATA[Viruses and worms]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[SECURITY]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/worm.html"><![CDATA[worm]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/good+worm.html"><![CDATA[good worm]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/conficker+problem.html"><![CDATA[Conficker problem]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/conficker.html"><![CDATA[Conficker]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Are worms actually good for security?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=91]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[You've probably heard by now that the Zotob worm is rampaging through business and organizations with computers running the Windows 2000 operating system, but could this actually be good for security?  The way that I see it, any computer worm that doesn't actually delete or steal any data is...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 09:51:34 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/worm.html"><![CDATA[worm]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
