<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[first partition Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/first+partition.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to first partition]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[How higher RPM hard drives rip you off]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10533-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=25339&messageID=475423&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[How higher RPM hard drives rip you offThe other issue...Whenever we installed our "High-end" DB on Servers (One of our E-Commerce customers were told to host their site through Navisite, just because of the load it would have) we used 15k drives with AIX. We got the best performance out...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 05:19:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/performance+management.html"><![CDATA[Performance management]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/first+partition.html"><![CDATA[FIRST PARTITION]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/rpm.html"><![CDATA[RPM]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hard+drive.html"><![CDATA[hard drive]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/performance.html"><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+system.html"><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
