<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[firefox 1.x Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/firefox+1.x.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to firefox 1.x]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="2" found="2" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Firefox 2 crash exploit and IE7 address spoofing flaw surfaces]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10533-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=26752&messageID=502331&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Firefox 2 crash exploit and IE7 address spoofing flaw surfacesYou're arguing FF is too young to be judged?"If you want to compare products and exploits then stick with the 7.0 vs 2.0 list since they've come out at the same time. (Though I'll be interested in the time difference between...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 02:13:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/web+browsers.html"><![CDATA[Web browsers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[SECURITY]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mozilla+firefox.html"><![CDATA[Mozilla Firefox]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/flaw.html"><![CDATA[flaw]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+internet+explorer+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Internet Explorer 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/firefox+1.x.html"><![CDATA[Firefox 1.X]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mozilla+firefox+2.0.html"><![CDATA[Mozilla Firefox 2.0]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Flaw found in Firefox]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-1009-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=9444&messageID=188066&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Flaw found in FirefoxJust provesNO browser is immune to flaws, not IE or Firefox.Let the flame wars begin!My browser will be immune in20 seconds as I unplug the PC from the network............................................................shabby reportingnowhere in the article does it say whether it affects firefox in msft windows, linux or apple...or all...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 14:36:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/web+browsers.html"><![CDATA[Web browsers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[SECURITY]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/firefox+1.x.html"><![CDATA[Firefox 1.X]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mozilla+firefox.html"><![CDATA[Mozilla Firefox]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/flaw.html"><![CDATA[flaw]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+internet+explorer.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/yes.html"><![CDATA[yes]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/secunia.html"><![CDATA[Secunia]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
