<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[fancy footwork Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/fancy+footwork.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to fancy footwork]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Microsoft's fancy footwork around netbooks continues]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12558-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=65507&messageID=1225028&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft's fancy footwork around netbooks continuesRE: Microsoft's fancy footwork around netbooks continuesThe problem is that everyone uses the term "netbook" but nobody can agree what one is. Is it defined by price? Size? Screen size? Processor power? Intended use? Form factor? Keyboard pitch? 3G/4G radio?Without agreement on terms, there's no...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:14:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/netbooks%252c+nettops+%2526+mids.html"><![CDATA[Netbooks, nettops & MIDs]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/netbook.html"><![CDATA[netbook]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/fancy+footwork.html"><![CDATA[fancy footwork]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pc.html"><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
