<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[eupl Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/eupl.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to eupl]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="3" found="3" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[What does Europe have against GPLv3?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=3780]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[My recent story on EUPL, the European Union Public License, drew some interesting reaction and this follow up question.    What does Europe have against GPLv3?    Roberto Galoppini, who first drew my attention to the issue, drew a response to his post from Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 07:39:13 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/gplv3.html"><![CDATA[GPLv3]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/eupl.html"><![CDATA[EUPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patrice-emmanuel+schmitz.html"><![CDATA[Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/galoppini.html"><![CDATA[Galoppini]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/dana+blankenhorn.html"><![CDATA[Dana Blankenhorn]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Europe gets its own GPL]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=62316&messageID=1148108&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Europe gets its own GPLLinux should take noticeSince none of the world embraces GPL, it's time for the commision to ask Linux to comply with something. They even created the license for Linux, to avoid lame excusesMicrosoft has its own vanity open licensesSo do other companies. The list at OSI...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:17:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[OPEN SOURCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/gpl.html"><![CDATA[GPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux.html"><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Europe gets its own GPL]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=3768]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Europe now has its own version of the GPL.    It's got copyleft, but it lacks the extra language found in GPLv3 meant to enforce that concept.    The European Union Public LicenseÂ is an effort by EU government services to codify a Euro-centric view of copyleft,...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:23:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/gpl.html"><![CDATA[GPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/osi.html"><![CDATA[OSI]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/license.html"><![CDATA[License]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/european+union+public+license.html"><![CDATA[European Union Public License]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/eupl.html"><![CDATA[EUPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/dana+blankenhorn.html"><![CDATA[Dana Blankenhorn]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
