<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[enhanced qos Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/enhanced+qos.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to enhanced qos]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Craigslist silently fixes their end in the Cox fiasco]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10533-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=23161&messageID=438388&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Craigslist silently fixes their end in the Cox fiascoPaper tigerYes George, you were right here, but being right about one case, which you persist in making all the case, does not mean you are right on your position on net neutrality.So kudos, but have you proved anything - NO. ...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 16:59:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/please+let.html"><![CDATA[Please Let]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/net+neutrality.html"><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/enhanced+qos.html"><![CDATA[Enhanced QoS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/craigslist.html"><![CDATA[Craigslist]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/snowe-dorgan.html"><![CDATA[Snowe-Dorgan]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/authentium.html"><![CDATA[Authentium]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/markey.html"><![CDATA[Markey]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
