<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[disruptive technologies Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/disruptive+technologies.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to disruptive technologies]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Disruptive technologies disrupt - goodbye newspaper companies]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11474-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=66185&messageID=1245270&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Disruptive technologies disrupt - goodbye newspaper companiesMicrosoftMS is clearly trying to reinvent itself, but can it do that without destroying its core business? Does MS have the cost structure and vision to survive?Disruptive Technology is such anidiotic phrase, I'm surprised anyone still uses it like it means something special.Pretty much...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 19:44:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/strategy.html"><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/goodbye+newspaper+company.html"><![CDATA[goodbye newspaper company]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/disruptive+technologies.html"><![CDATA[Disruptive Technologies]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pretty+much.html"><![CDATA[Pretty Much]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/disruptive+technology.html"><![CDATA[Disruptive Technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
