<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[defamation Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/defamation.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to defamation]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="14" found="14" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Defamation or free speech? U.S. court orders Google to hand over identity of blogger]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=68170&messageID=1298535&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[If ordered by a judge...releasing the identity to the plaintiff is fair and necessary, otherwise you have no recourse.I will take issue with one statement however. You wrote "After all, it?s protected free speech to say that you believe someone is disingenuous or otherwise intolerable. It?s another thing to imply...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:17:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/defamation.html"><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/identity.html"><![CDATA[identity]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/google+inc..html"><![CDATA[Google Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/what-if.html"><![CDATA[What-If]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GOOG</category>
		<category domain="tickers">GOOG</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[The First Amendment rights of anonymous defamers]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11155-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=68169&messageID=1298471&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, this is a 6th amendment issue.Namely, the right to face your accuser in a court of law. The anonymity was stripped because the woman intended to file criminal charges.Huh?The blogger was intending to sue the celebrity?The difference between free speech and defamationWhy do people think they can say ANYTHING...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:35:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/first+amendment.html"><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/defamation.html"><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/perpetrator.html"><![CDATA[perpetrator]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[The First Amendment rights of anonymous defamers]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://government.zdnet.com/?p=5268]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Photo posted on 'Skanks of NYC' blog    Yesterday I wrote that a Manhattan federal judge has ordered Google to tell supermodel Liskula Cohen the identity of the blogger behind the "Skanks of NYC" blog, which brands Cohen "a psychotic, lying, whoring, still going to clubs at her...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:38:20 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/defamation.html"><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/first+amendment.html"><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cahill.html"><![CDATA[Cahill]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/courts.html"><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/d.c.+case.html"><![CDATA[D.C. Case]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet.html"><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/richard+koman.html"><![CDATA[Richard Koman]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Google reveals identify of Cohen 'skank' blogger]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11155-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=68123&messageID=1297380&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to the Internet only AOL ex/users give real info.Welcome to the internet everyone. It is amazing how many dummies give out real information to services that should not be given real information. This is a product of AOL where dummies who shouldn't have been on the internet got onto...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:46:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blogging.html"><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet.html"><![CDATA[INTERNET]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cohen.html"><![CDATA[Cohen]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blogger.html"><![CDATA[blogger]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/defamation.html"><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/real+name.html"><![CDATA[real name]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/google+inc..html"><![CDATA[Google Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GOOG</category>
		<category domain="tickers">GOOG</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Company sues for defamation over tweet]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11155-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=67276&messageID=1275363&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Company sues for defamation over tweetIn cases like it shouldn't stay 'between you and them'Because it is usually a systemic problem when things like this come up. I would like to believe that companies 'do the right thing', however I have had enough experience TO THE BLEEPING CONTRARY that I...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:53:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/defamation.html"><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tweet.html"><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Company sues for defamation over tweet]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://government.zdnet.com/?p=5151]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[So Amanda Bonnen tweeted about her apartment, rented from Horizon Realty Group. She said:      Who said sleeping in a moldy apartment is bad for you? Horizon realty thinks it's okay.      That made the realty company really mad. So they sued...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:19:56 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/defamation.html"><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apartment.html"><![CDATA[Apartment]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/richard+koman.html"><![CDATA[Richard Koman]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Legalists: Google Case Precedent for Challenging Privacy]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Greenfield/?p=158]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, Google released the name of an anonymous blogger engaged in a defamation case in Israel. The case is significant on a number of accounts not the least of which is because it may help loosen privacy restrictions in the US.        You can...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:31:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/google+inc..html"><![CDATA[Google Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/defamation.html"><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/techcrunch.html"><![CDATA[TechCrunch]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/privacy.html"><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/israel.html"><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/david+mirchin.html"><![CDATA[David Mirchin]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/investment.html"><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/finance.html"><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/dave+greenfield.html"><![CDATA[Dave Greenfield]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GOOG</category>
		<category domain="tickers">GOOG</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Chris Pirillo is socialsquatted; does the law care?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Howell/?p=156]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris Pirillo is on Pownce at pownce.com/chrispirillo, and has 69 friends.  Or wait, that's not Chris.  I can scarcely catalog the related legal considerations, which include:Can Chris stop someone from using his name and likeness without his consent?  Possibly, under right of publicity laws, but the ones...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 21:04:56 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/trademark.html"><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tags.html"><![CDATA[Tags]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/social+networking.html"><![CDATA[Social networking]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/live+web.html"><![CDATA[Live Web]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/identity.html"><![CDATA[Identity]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/free+speech.html"><![CDATA[Free speech]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/defamation.html"><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Defamation suit tests online anonymity]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-1009-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=35113&messageID=646824&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Defamation suit tests online anonymityThe little town of McAlester OK istrying to test the boundries of Internet free speech.http://www.mcalesternews.com/local/local_story_167184837.htmlThe Genie in the BottleUnfortunately this seems to be like a Genie in a bottle thing.  Just like the accusation of Sexual Harrassment is often enough to get someone removed, replaced...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 05:49:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/defamation.html"><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[If reputation is money in the bank, who owns the PIN?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Howell/?p=129]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[As evidenced by the many lawsuits against Google concerning PageRank or other search result read reputational slippage, the notion that you own your digital reputation &mdash; even if it is at bottom a collaborative work that begins with your actions, but thereafter depends on the reactions of others &mdash; has...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 10:17:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/attention.html"><![CDATA[Attention]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/copyright.html"><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/defamation.html"><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/lawsuits.html"><![CDATA[Lawsuits]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patent.html"><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/privacy.html"><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/trademark.html"><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/trust.html"><![CDATA[Trust]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Blogging codes of conduct:  consensus still seems unlikely]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Howell/?p=118]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[My thoughts about consensus on a blogging code of conduct are unchanged:  consensus is unlikely, but the discussion is useful.  Here are some comments I sent this morning to an editor at Der Spiegel Online (is it just me, or is the tenor of these questions in keeping...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 06:11:25 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/voice.html"><![CDATA[Voice]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/trust.html"><![CDATA[Trust]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/free+speech.html"><![CDATA[Free speech]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/live+web.html"><![CDATA[Live Web]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/defamation.html"><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/collaboration.html"><![CDATA[Collaboration]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blogging.html"><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/attention.html"><![CDATA[Attention]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/anonymity.html"><![CDATA[Anonymity]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Podcast on the law of business communities]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Howell/?p=106]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[The conference call Mike Madison and I recorded earlier this week in anticipation of our session at Community 2.0 more here and here is now available as part of the Bag and Baggage Podcast or from the Future of Communities blog.  We talked about:  Defining community and loosely-joined...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 13:48:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/attention.html"><![CDATA[Attention]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blogging.html"><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/collaboration.html"><![CDATA[Collaboration]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/compliance.html"><![CDATA[Compliance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/conferences.html"><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/copyright.html"><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/defamation.html"><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/dmca.html"><![CDATA[DMCA]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/free+speech.html"><![CDATA[Free speech]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/identity.html"><![CDATA[Identity]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/licenses.html"><![CDATA[Licenses]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mgm+v.+grokster.html"><![CDATA[MGM v. Grokster]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/social+networking.html"><![CDATA[Social networking]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/social+news.html"><![CDATA[Social news]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/trademark.html"><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/user+generated+content.html"><![CDATA[User generated content]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/virtual+worlds.html"><![CDATA[Virtual worlds]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/voice.html"><![CDATA[Voice]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Courts continue to immunize community sites under CDA Section 230, but what about the Live Web?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Howell/?p=101]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Hard on the heels of a Texas district courts recent decision to dismiss claims against MySpace, Howard Bashman spotted a recent Section 230 decision out of the First Circuit that continues in this vein, and emphasizes the clear judicial trend of applying Section 230s protections to Web sites acting as...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 18:20:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/user+generated+content.html"><![CDATA[User generated content]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mashups.html"><![CDATA[Mashups]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/defamation.html"><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/podcasting.html"><![CDATA[Podcasting]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/live+web.html"><![CDATA[Live Web]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/free+speech.html"><![CDATA[Free speech]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/copyright.html"><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blogging.html"><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/anonymity.html"><![CDATA[Anonymity]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[California Supreme Court says individuals not liable for defamatory online third party acts]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Howell/?p=64]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[The California Supreme Courts opinion in Barrett v. Rosenthal issued today, and, as was widely anticipated, the Court reversed the appellate decision that was under review.  Although the case involved a newsgroup posting, todays decision is nevertheless excellent news for bloggers, and brings California law in line with that...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:15:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blogging.html"><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/podcasting.html"><![CDATA[Podcasting]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/user+generated+content.html"><![CDATA[User generated content]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/video.html"><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/defamation.html"><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
