<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[deep packet inspection Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/deep+packet+inspection.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to deep packet inspection]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="6" found="6" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Report: Improper use of Deep Packet Inspection could be Internet game-changer]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=62318&messageID=1148228&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Report: Improper use of Deep Packet Inspection could be Internet game-changerOK on the Proper use of routing 9-1-1 traffic, but utterally scary on the improper use.There are already people paranoid about using there CC's online, now you are going to tell them that "hey we reserve the right to read...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:20:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet+service+providers+%2528isps%2529.html"><![CDATA[Internet service providers (ISPs)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[SECURITY]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/deep+packet+inspection.html"><![CDATA[Deep Packet Inspection]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet.html"><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Berners-Lee: Deep packet inspection compromises Net integrity]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=61875&messageID=1139678&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Berners-Lee: Deep packet inspection compromises Net integrityBerners-Lee gets it rightI am TERRIFIED of deep packet inspection, for the sole reason that some morality bound assw*pes might get their panties in a bunch because I am looking at porn and try to get me arrested.Simply put: there should be NO snooping...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:25:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/berners-lee.html"><![CDATA[Berners-Lee]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/deep+packet+inspection.html"><![CDATA[Deep Packet Inspection]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Deep packet inspection takes another hit as Phorm execs leave]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=55645&messageID=1051055&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Deep packet inspection takes another hit as Phorm execs leaveHuh?"You'll recall that DPI is the technology that some ISPs were considering to scour a customer's computer for granular information so it could deliver more relevant ads."DPI does not touch a user's computer.  It looks at the network flows packets...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:05:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/productivity.html"><![CDATA[PRODUCTIVITY]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/phorm.html"><![CDATA[Phorm]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/deep+packet+inspection.html"><![CDATA[Deep Packet Inspection]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/computer.html"><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[ISPs keep their distance from deep packet inspection]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=52397&messageID=987946&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[ISPs keep their distance from deep packet inspectionIm sure everyone will back away except..Comcast. Anything they can do to line their pockets with more revenue from their "happy" customer-base and make their experience as "COMCASTIC" as possible - they will do. So while Verizon, TWC, and AT&T backaway, Comcast sees...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 06:09:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet+service+providers+%2528isps%2529.html"><![CDATA[Internet service providers (ISPs)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet+service+provider.html"><![CDATA[Internet Service Provider]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/packet+inspection.html"><![CDATA[packet inspection]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Deep packet spy's CEO resigns]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=51543&messageID=968654&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Deep packet spy's CEO resignsThrowing out the baby with the bathwater[i]... it doesn't sound like there's a long prosperous future ahead for deep packet inspection or NebuAd...[/i]So one CEO leaves a company and all of Deep Packet Inspection technology fails? Last I checked most DPI companies were doing quite well.One...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:17:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/deep+packet.html"><![CDATA[Deep Packet]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/nebuad.html"><![CDATA[NebuAd]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Big Telco wants to ream you with "deep packet inspection"]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12694-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=41995&messageID=774702&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Big Telco wants to ream you with "deep packet inspection"You just don't get itWhat's good for AT&T is good for America.  Internet traffic isn't the only potential gold mine, by the way: monitoring your telephone calls has vast potential for revolutionary new services.For instance, if you call an auto...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:09:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/government.html"><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/telecom+%2526+utilities.html"><![CDATA[Telecom & Utilities]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/telecommunications.html"><![CDATA[TELECOMMUNICATIONS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/eternal+vigilance.html"><![CDATA[Eternal Vigilance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/big+telco.html"><![CDATA[Big Telco]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/deep+packet+inspection.html"><![CDATA[deep packet inspection]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/packet+inspection.html"><![CDATA[packet inspection]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/telecommunications+company.html"><![CDATA[telecommunications company]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mse.html"><![CDATA[MSE]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
