<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[datacore Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/datacore.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to datacore]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="4" found="4" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[DataCore Advanced Site Recovery]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12695-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=66332&messageID=1250131&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[DataCore Advanced Site RecoverySo this is basically an advertisement ntnt = no textSure feels like oneThis is a press release, not a blog.  Where is the meat to the topic?  Where are the technical notes about this product?  How does it compare to established players like Veritas...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 06:10:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/utility+computing.html"><![CDATA[Utility computing]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/datacore.html"><![CDATA[DataCore]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[DataCore Advanced Site Recovery]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/virtualization/?p=1028]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[It's been quite a while since I last spoke with the folks from DataCore. I believe that the last post on this company was back in August 2008 (see Datacore - nothing but storage.) Last time the discussion focused on the need organizations should recognize to pair virtual storage solutions...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 03:00:57 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/data+center.html"><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/recovery.html"><![CDATA[Recovery]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/approach.html"><![CDATA[Approach]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/datacore.html"><![CDATA[DataCore]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/data+centers.html"><![CDATA[Data Centers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/storage.html"><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/disaster+recovery.html"><![CDATA[Disaster Recovery]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hardware.html"><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/data+management.html"><![CDATA[Data Management]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/dan+kusnetzky.html"><![CDATA[Dan Kusnetzky]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Datacore - nothing but storage]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/virtualization/?p=518]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Angie Gonzalez, of Datacore, and I had a conversation about how virtual storage complements any type of virtual processing solution. Nearly all virtual server-based solutions gain a great deal of benefit when a supporting virtual storage strategy is also deployed. Why is that?       ...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 03:00:03 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/datacore.html"><![CDATA[Datacore]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/storage.html"><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hardware.html"><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/dan+kusnetzky.html"><![CDATA[Dan Kusnetzky]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Virtual Iron partners with FalconStor]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12695-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=43096&messageID=795809&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Virtual Iron partners with FalconStorWhats the big deal?Virtual Iron did the same thing with DataCore a few months back and they have even sold a number of customers together. Frankly, with the new Datacore and Virtual Iron packages, you get more for the money. This really isn't major news but...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 08:37:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/business+structures.html"><![CDATA[Business structures]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vi3.html"><![CDATA[VI3]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/virtual+iron.html"><![CDATA[Virtual Iron]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/falconstor.html"><![CDATA[FalconStor]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/virtual+iron+partner.html"><![CDATA[Virtual Iron partner]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/datacore.html"><![CDATA[DataCore]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/partnership.html"><![CDATA[partnership]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">FALC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">FALC</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
