<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[court document Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/court+document.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to court document]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="2" found="2" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Cisco squares with Apple off over "iPhone" moniker]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11408-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=29050&messageID=540890&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Cisco squares with Apple off over "iPhone" monikerCisco case appears to be weakThere are already other phone products on the market with iPhone in their name. The fact that Cisco has not shut these companies down severely weakens their position. If you don't aggressively defend a trademark or copyright, the...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 07:02:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/court+document.html"><![CDATA[court document]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cisco+systems+inc..html"><![CDATA[Cisco Systems Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+iphone.html"><![CDATA[Apple iPhone]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+inc..html"><![CDATA[Apple Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AAPL</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">CSCO</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AAPL,CSCO</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[SCO seeks to buttress case against Big Blue]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-3513-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=4287&messageID=88985&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[SCO seeks to buttress case against Big BlueWho Cares?ZDnet why must you beat us with every silly SCO move?  They are a tiny company, with no real case.  They try to stretch out the case as long as possible in hopes of getting contracts from paranoid companies. ...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2004 05:07:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[OPEN SOURCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/court+document.html"><![CDATA[court document]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ibm+corp..html"><![CDATA[IBM Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sco+group+inc..html"><![CDATA[SCO Group Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">IBM</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">SCOX Q</category>
		<category domain="tickers">IBM,SCOX Q</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
