<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[continuation Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/continuation.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to continuation]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Fixing a broken patent system]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9595-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=39707&messageID=729889&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Fixing a broken patent systemReform?Patent reform is meaningless unless software patentability is abolished and it remains first to invent. First to file tends to reward companies with deep pockets. Not necessarily the actual innovator.Sourcing has astronomical elasticity. Example: Compression RDK_aa3.4.6..i2Bill Gates owns most anything to be said and made for...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 05:57:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patent+reform.html"><![CDATA[Patent Reform]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sourcing.html"><![CDATA[sourcing]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patent+system.html"><![CDATA[patent system]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/inventor.html"><![CDATA[inventor]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patent.html"><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/continuation.html"><![CDATA[continuation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software.html"><![CDATA[software]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
