<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[content caching Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/content+caching.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to content caching]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Ou: Google hypocritical on neutrality]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11155-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=55489&messageID=1049110&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Ou: Google hypocritical on neutralityLet's go back and look at the argument of Net Neutralityhttp://www.jedreport.com/2008/12/lessigs-defense.htmlThe whole argument that Net Neutrality proponents made is that they don't want premium content delivery using fast lanes.  Caching is warp speed lane prioritization.  Their whole argument is that it prevents the little...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:50:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet+service+providers+%2528isps%2529.html"><![CDATA[Internet service providers (ISPs)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/content+caching.html"><![CDATA[Content Caching]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/net+neutrality.html"><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet+service+provider.html"><![CDATA[Internet Service Provider]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/qos.html"><![CDATA[QoS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/google+inc..html"><![CDATA[Google Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GOOG</category>
		<category domain="tickers">GOOG</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
