<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[conficker problem Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/conficker+problem.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to conficker problem]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Can good worms solve the Conficker problem?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12353-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=63099&messageID=1166594&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Can good worms solve the Conficker problem?Can good worms solve the Conficker problem?I like the idea in theory but then you are doubling worm traffic due to the good guys fighting the bad guys. One way around that is to have a worm kill switch to kill it once all...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:48:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cyberthreats.html"><![CDATA[Cyberthreats]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/viruses+and+worms.html"><![CDATA[Viruses and worms]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[SECURITY]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/worm.html"><![CDATA[worm]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/good+worm.html"><![CDATA[good worm]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/conficker+problem.html"><![CDATA[Conficker problem]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/conficker.html"><![CDATA[Conficker]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
