<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[cobol move Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cobol+move.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to cobol move]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Is OOP a branch to nowhere?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Murphy/?p=1122]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[  To continue the discussion about development languages, I want to ask a potentially embarrassing question: has the whole object orientation business been both a functional and a conceptual failure?     One of the odd things about the OO movement is that no two proponents understand...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 10:26:33 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/object-oriented+programming.html"><![CDATA[Object-oriented Programming]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/object-oriented.html"><![CDATA[Object-oriented]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/machine.html"><![CDATA[Machine]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cobol+move.html"><![CDATA[COBOL MOVE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ooa%252food%252foop.html"><![CDATA[Ooa/Ood/Oop]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software+development.html"><![CDATA[Software Development]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software%252fweb+development.html"><![CDATA[Software/Web Development]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/paul+murphy.html"><![CDATA[Paul Murphy]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
