<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[clarification Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/clarification.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to clarification]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[eBay wins round in 'Buy it now' patent redux]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9588-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=36763&messageID=676544&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[eBay wins round in 'Buy it now' patent reduxClarification is goodI'm hopeful that this case will clarify to what degree the "infringer" sic can be subject to an injunction, which can literally stop the business. Seems harsh if something can be worked around so easily, no?I'm glad also that there...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:47:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patent.html"><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/buy-it-now.html"><![CDATA[Buy-It-Now]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/clarification.html"><![CDATA[clarification]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ebay+inc..html"><![CDATA[eBay Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">EBAY</category>
		<category domain="tickers">EBAY</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
