<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[chipset Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipset.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to chipset]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="20" found="87" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[AMD turbo boosts Flash Player 10.1 with ATI Stream technology]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=71691&messageID=1384615&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[AMD seems to be the more viable choice nowThey certainly have improved their offerings over Intel and NVIDIA, which both seem to be up in the air at the moment.  Intel isn't focused on offering good mainstream performance for the dollar - they're only working on Atom and the...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:10:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipsets.html"><![CDATA[Chipsets]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/macromedia+flash+player.html"><![CDATA[Macromedia Flash Player]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/nvidia+corp..html"><![CDATA[NVidia Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advanced+micro+devices+inc..html"><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ati+technologies+inc..html"><![CDATA[ATI Technologies Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/amd+785g.html"><![CDATA[AMD 785G]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/gpu.html"><![CDATA[GPU]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/amd+athlon.html"><![CDATA[AMD Athlon]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipset.html"><![CDATA[chipset]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMD</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">ATYT</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">NVDA</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AMD,ATYT,INTC,NVDA</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Is Nvidia planning to add X86 compatibility to its chipsets?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11474-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=71275&messageID=1373900&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope soNVIDIA with x86-64 technology would be Next Big ThingTM, although I'd rather see a new architecture replace the aging x86.  64-bit is just a tack-on feature set of x86.  I'd rather see something in line with IA64 from NVIDIA to shake up Intel.  I'm sure...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 04:58:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/video+decoding.html"><![CDATA[Video Decoding]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipset.html"><![CDATA[chipset]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+x86.html"><![CDATA[Intel x86]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cpu.html"><![CDATA[CPU]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/nvidia+corp..html"><![CDATA[NVidia Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/gpu.html"><![CDATA[GPU]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/graphics.html"><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advanced+micro+devices+inc..html"><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMD</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">NVDA</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AMD,INTC,NVDA</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Intel debuts Core i7 960]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=70626&messageID=1356048&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Why?LGA1366 is effectively dead.RE: Intel debuts Core i7 960I think I was happier when Intel had competition at the high end and had to price their chips accordingly.Whether or not I use AMD, I need them to compete better to keep Intel's prices down.Why would you say that?Where are you...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:16:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipsets.html"><![CDATA[Chipsets]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/socket.html"><![CDATA[socket]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipset.html"><![CDATA[chipset]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/lga1366.html"><![CDATA[LGA1366]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/bloomfield.html"><![CDATA[Bloomfield]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/lga1156.html"><![CDATA[LGA1156]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Netgear slammed for doing the right thing]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=70242&messageID=1346734&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[So Welte is a 30-something who thinks his $hit doesn't stink...big deal.Wow..."Harald Welte has more power than I do, power he has earned over many years with good works."Power? Is that something that makes him special? I doubt it. Is power something that impresses you Dana? I feel sorry for...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:12:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipsets.html"><![CDATA[Chipsets]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/routers+%2526+switches.html"><![CDATA[Routers & switches]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+technology.html"><![CDATA[Network technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/netgear+inc..html"><![CDATA[Netgear Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux.html"><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/router.html"><![CDATA[router]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/gpl.html"><![CDATA[GPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipset.html"><![CDATA[chipset]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/torvalds.html"><![CDATA[Torvalds]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[End of the line for NVIDIA chipsets, and that's official]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=70091&messageID=1342442&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Just like IntelNow this is an opinion based off Intel's way of operating business but what changed to take away NVidia's X86 Compatible Chipset licenses with the new processors?   I guess there has been lots of history that shows Intel likes to bully it's competitors to make sure...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:44:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipsets.html"><![CDATA[Chipsets]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/nvidia+corp..html"><![CDATA[NVidia Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipset.html"><![CDATA[chipset]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processor.html"><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">NVDA</category>
		<category domain="tickers">INTC,NVDA</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[64-bit Snow Leopard defaults to 32-bit kernel]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9595-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=68463&messageID=1306232&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[seriously"our mid-2007 MacBook only showed 3GB available for system use through Activity Monitor despite having 4GB installed, not delivering the true 64-bit experience."If it is the Intel 960 chipset it was only supported for 2GB RAM.  I have one its a chipset limitation every PC or MAC that has...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 06:36:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipsets.html"><![CDATA[Chipsets]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+technology.html"><![CDATA[Network technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/64-bit.html"><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/snow+leopard.html"><![CDATA[Snow Leopard]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipset.html"><![CDATA[chipset]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chip.html"><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+inc..html"><![CDATA[Apple Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/kernel.html"><![CDATA[kernel]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+macintosh.html"><![CDATA[Apple Macintosh]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/32-bit.html"><![CDATA[32-bit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AAPL</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AAPL</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[MSDN, TechNet users to get Windows 7 tomorrow]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12558-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=67567&messageID=1283262&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[MSDN, TechNet users to get Windows 7 tomorrowPosting to MSDN: Time of day?Knowing that the download servers will melt down into slag, does MSDN post at a particular time of day?Any idea on MSDNAA?if/when will it be available on MSDNAA, and what version??? any idea?Houston: We have a problemfyi,http://infoworld.com/d/windows/critical-windows-7-bug-risks-derailing-product-launch-330(Don't shoot...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 07:36:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipsets.html"><![CDATA[Chipsets]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+developer+network.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Developer Network]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/technet+user.html"><![CDATA[TechNet user]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+7+tomorrow.html"><![CDATA[Windows 7 tomorrow]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/time+of+day.html"><![CDATA[time of day]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipset.html"><![CDATA[chipset]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+technet.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft TechNet]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Intel Atom processors hit 2.0GHz]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=62300&messageID=1147805&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel Atom processors hit 2.0GHzGMA 500 is crapTotal crap. Ask any unlucky Sony Vaio P owner.Intel had better make better chipset/video drivers or re-engineer the thing.RE: Intel Atom processors hit 2.0GHz2GB Max?  You kidding right?  With memory being so cheap now, it should support 4GB at least.If that's...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 07:36:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipsets.html"><![CDATA[Chipsets]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/gma+500.html"><![CDATA[GMA 500]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/graphics.html"><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipset.html"><![CDATA[chipset]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+atom.html"><![CDATA[Intel Atom]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processor.html"><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Windows 7 - Mobile Broadband Certification for Existing Chipsets]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://whitepapers.zdnet.com/abstract.aspx?docid=1104565]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[This paper provides information about Windows 7 support for Mobile Broadband. It provides guidelines for hardware manufacturers, original equipment manufacturers, and mobile network operators on developing logo-compliant Mobile Broadband drivers for chipsets/modules that are already commercially deployed. By following the recommendations in this paper, older devices can meet all the...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[White papers]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipset.html"><![CDATA[Chipset]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/certification.html"><![CDATA[Certification]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mobile.html"><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/broadband.html"><![CDATA[Broadband]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mobile+broadband.html"><![CDATA[Mobile Broadband]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advertising+%2526+promotion.html"><![CDATA[Advertising & Promotion]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/wireless+and+mobility.html"><![CDATA[Wireless And Mobility]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/marketing.html"><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[NVIDIA Tegra APX 2600 mobile chipset on Android revealed]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-13615-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=60975&messageID=1122354&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[NVIDIA Tegra APX 2600 mobile chipset on Android revealedThese will be the new netbook processors. Powerfull, 10 hours of battery life. And, Microsoft does not have an answer for this segment.]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:55:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipsets.html"><![CDATA[Chipsets]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/nvidia+tegra+apx+2600.html"><![CDATA[NVIDIA Tegra APX 2600]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/nvidia+tegra.html"><![CDATA[NVIDIA Tegra]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mobile+chipset.html"><![CDATA[mobile chipset]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/nvidia+corp..html"><![CDATA[NVidia Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipset.html"><![CDATA[chipset]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mobile.html"><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">NVDA</category>
		<category domain="tickers">NVDA</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Intel shipping Atom N280 Netbook processor]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-13615-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=60550&messageID=1113253&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel shipping Atom N280 Netbook processorWhat happened to AMD?nt]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 15:25:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/netbooks%252c+nettops+%2526+mids.html"><![CDATA[Netbooks, nettops & MIDs]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/atom+n280.html"><![CDATA[Atom N280]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/atom+n280+netbook.html"><![CDATA[Atom N280 Netbook]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/netbook.html"><![CDATA[netbook]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processor.html"><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Netbooks vs. Laptops: Nvidia 9400M 'Ion' chipset stirs competition]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-13615-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=55588&messageID=1050412&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Netbooks vs. Laptops: Nvidia 9400M 'Ion' chipset stirs competitionNetbooks perhaps notbut netboxes,especially those from MSI, and nettops,with up to 22" touch screen, would definitively need better graphic and more processing power.]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:34:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipsets.html"><![CDATA[Chipsets]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/notebooks.html"><![CDATA[Notebooks]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/netbook.html"><![CDATA[NetBook]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/nvidia+9400m.html"><![CDATA[NVIDIA 9400M]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/nvidia+corp..html"><![CDATA[NVidia Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipset.html"><![CDATA[chipset]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/laptop+computer.html"><![CDATA[laptop computer]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">NVDA</category>
		<category domain="tickers">NVDA</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[6GB of RAM possible in new MacBook and MBP]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11408-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=53679&messageID=1016147&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[6GB of RAM possible in new MacBook and MBPThe problem is that at least 2GB ....... will be substantially slowwer.  DDR memory alternates devices when storing data to allow for address lines to stabilize.  There is no second memory location for half of the $GB device.Dell E series...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:20:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/notebooks.html"><![CDATA[Notebooks]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+macbook.html"><![CDATA[Apple MacBook]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cpu.html"><![CDATA[CPU]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ram.html"><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Why Apple will shift to an NVIDIA chipset]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=52974&messageID=1000028&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Why Apple will shift to an NVIDIA chipsetNvidia- Extent of Chip PerformanceThe move if true could leverage Transmeta's Intellectual Property.It would be a fast trac expedite, but the leg work could have been done during the due dilegence by Nvidia.Yes I am a Transmeta shareholder.This may balance the NVidia vs...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:53:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipsets.html"><![CDATA[Chipsets]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/performance+management.html"><![CDATA[Performance management]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/notebooks.html"><![CDATA[Notebooks]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/nvidia+corp..html"><![CDATA[NVidia Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/graphics.html"><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/performance.html"><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipset.html"><![CDATA[chipset]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+inc..html"><![CDATA[Apple Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AAPL</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">NVDA</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AAPL,NVDA</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Report: AMD to challenge Nvidia's $60 graphics]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12690-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=51473&messageID=967136&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Report: AMD to challenge Nvidia's $60 graphicsAMD 4650 for 780G chipset?I don't think it will work well with Radeon HD 3200 chipset as a Hybrid Crossfire... :(i want...I want my discrete graphics card to turn itself off when not needed. Make sure it will be possible with your next integrated...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 06:58:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipsets.html"><![CDATA[Chipsets]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/video+cards.html"><![CDATA[Video cards]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/graphics.html"><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advanced+micro+devices+inc..html"><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/video+card.html"><![CDATA[video card]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/nvidia+corp..html"><![CDATA[NVidia Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipset.html"><![CDATA[chipset]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMD</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">NVDA</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AMD,NVDA</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[New Intel chipset lays the foundation for sub-$200 desktops]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=51068&messageID=959569&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[New Intel chipset lays the foundation for sub-$200 desktopsLinux - or MS better reconsiderSeems like a good chip - but no vista. Either Linux or MS had better do a major rethink on XP support.]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:22:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipsets.html"><![CDATA[Chipsets]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux.html"><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/new+intel.html"><![CDATA[NEW Intel]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipset.html"><![CDATA[chipset]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/desktop.html"><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Via stops making chipsets for Intel, AMD systems]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12690-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=50706&messageID=952259&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Via stops making chipsets for Intel, AMD systemsDidnt see this coming.....not.They make all the chipset in most thin clients sold around the world.  Low power consumption and stability are key.They still arent at the level of amd and intel though, so could they really be considered a competitor? ...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:06:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipsets.html"><![CDATA[Chipsets]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/amd-systems.html"><![CDATA[AMD-systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipset.html"><![CDATA[chipset]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[New MacBooks going glass]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11408-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=50242&messageID=942361&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[New MacBooks going glassDid I hear what I thought I heard...it sounds like Apple is walking the same path of change and evolution that Dell walked so time ago...Dare I say they may actually be using nVidia Chipsets vs the Intel ones they're using now?  While Intel is always...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:57:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipsets.html"><![CDATA[Chipsets]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipset.html"><![CDATA[chipset]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+inc..html"><![CDATA[Apple Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/new+macbooks.html"><![CDATA[New MacBooks]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/dell+computer+corp..html"><![CDATA[Dell Computer Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AAPL</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">DELL</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AAPL,DELL,INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Intel Centrino 2 lives]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://content.zdnet.com/2346-12554_22-210949.html]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Following a technical stumble which allowed AMD to gain a lead, Intel has now released the long awaited Centrino 2 notebook platform. by Adrian Kingsley-Hughes]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Image galleries]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 04:21:27 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+centrino.html"><![CDATA[Intel Centrino]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel+corp..html"><![CDATA[Intel Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/notebooks.html"><![CDATA[Notebooks]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hardware.html"><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/notebooks+%2526+tablets.html"><![CDATA[Notebooks & Tablets]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/semiconductors.html"><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/components.html"><![CDATA[Components]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/adrian+kingsley-hughes.html"><![CDATA[Adrian Kingsley-Hughes]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/intel.html"><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/centrino.html"><![CDATA[centrino]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/wifi.html"><![CDATA[wifi]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipset.html"><![CDATA[chipset]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/core.html"><![CDATA[core]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cpu.html"><![CDATA[cpu]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category>
		<category domain="tickers">INTC</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Apple leaks iPhone 3G chipset in SDK]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11408-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=46465&messageID=861252&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple leaks iPhone 3G chipset in SDKspeed but not enterpriseIt is very good for users who likes very much to share media files an upcoming faster speedy tech for mobile internet and maybe for video calls But what about for users like me that would like to create office files...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 21:06:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipsets.html"><![CDATA[Chipsets]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cellular+phones.html"><![CDATA[Cellular phones]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/3g.html"><![CDATA[3G]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/iphone+3g.html"><![CDATA[iPhone 3G]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/sdk.html"><![CDATA[SDK]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chipset.html"><![CDATA[chipset]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+iphone.html"><![CDATA[Apple iPhone]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/apple+inc..html"><![CDATA[Apple Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AAPL</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AAPL</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
