<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[cert Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cert.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to cert]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="17" found="17" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Kaminsky suggests long-term fix will still have to be determined, but patch now, or pay soon]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1552]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[I listened to the Black Hat webcast today to grab as much info as I could on this subject.  The biggest thing that I heard from the whole talk is that the patch fixes things to a reasonable point, but that long-term, there will have to be more work...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:30:20 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cert.html"><![CDATA[CERT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/dns+server.html"><![CDATA[DNS Server]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/domain+names.html"><![CDATA[Domain Names]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet.html"><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/kaminsky.html"><![CDATA[Kaminsky]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/nathan+mcfeters.html"><![CDATA[Nathan McFeters]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patches.html"><![CDATA[Patches]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/server.html"><![CDATA[Server]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Dan Kaminsky breaks DNS, massive multi-vendor patch coming, details at Black Hat Vegas '08]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1460]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[It would seem there's a bigger story to that MS08-037 flaw that came out for Patch Tuesday today.    From Dave Lewis over at the Liquid Matrix security blog:  Today Dan Kaminsky released a first, as far as I can recall. A coordinated patch was released today...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:59:53 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/black+hat.html"><![CDATA[Black Hat]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/dns.html"><![CDATA[DNS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cert.html"><![CDATA[CERT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/flaw.html"><![CDATA[Flaw]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mogull.html"><![CDATA[Mogull]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/updates.html"><![CDATA[Updates]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/domain+names.html"><![CDATA[Domain Names]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/networking.html"><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet.html"><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/nathan+mcfeters.html"><![CDATA[Nathan McFeters]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Do we need another CERT?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=47363&messageID=881666&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Do we need another CERT?what linux/unix taking a queue from MShell hath frozen over!btw, doesnt red hat have an live update like system?Huh???How is this a page from MS? And by looking at the second question I'd have to wonder why you're even making comments about Linux.]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 12:40:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cert.html"><![CDATA[CERT]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Google launches CERT for open source]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1076]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Google on Tuesday detailed plans for oCERT, a volunteer workforce that will remediate security issues in open source applications.    The move makes a ton of sense. Community driven software can have bugs and plenty of folks to find these vulnerabilities. The problem: There's no central group to...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 08:09:45 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/google+inc..html"><![CDATA[Google Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cert.html"><![CDATA[CERT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ocert.html"><![CDATA[oCERT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/larry+dignan.html"><![CDATA[Larry Dignan]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GOOG</category>
		<category domain="tickers">GOOG</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Do we need another CERT?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=2392]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes.    Google's backingÂ of oCERT is a major milestone in the history of open source.    It's not that I have anything against the Computer Emergency Response TeamCERT at Carnegie-Mellon. They do important work, not only in identifying risks but in educating people on them. ...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 07:15:06 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vulnerability.html"><![CDATA[Vulnerability]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cert.html"><![CDATA[CERT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/windows+machine.html"><![CDATA[Windows Machine]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/dana.html"><![CDATA[Dana]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/dana+blankenhorn.html"><![CDATA[Dana Blankenhorn]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[So long ActiveX. Will I miss you?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=850]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[I'm following the advice of US CERT and other security wonks and disabling my ActiveX controls in IE. The big question: Will I miss it?    The short answer is probably not since I mostly use Firefox. However, there are times when I'll toggle over to IE for...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:35:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cert.html"><![CDATA[CERT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+internet+explorer.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/activex.html"><![CDATA[ActiveX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/activex%252fcom%252fcom%252b%252fdcom.html"><![CDATA[ActiveX/COM/COM+/DCOM]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/web+browsers.html"><![CDATA[Web Browsers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/middleware.html"><![CDATA[Middleware]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software+development.html"><![CDATA[Software Development]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software%252fweb+development.html"><![CDATA[Software/Web Development]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/internet.html"><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/enterprise+software.html"><![CDATA[Enterprise Software]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software.html"><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/larry+dignan.html"><![CDATA[Larry Dignan]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[CERT: AOL Radio has high-risk flaw]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12691-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=43017&messageID=794803&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[CERT: AOL Radio has high-risk flawAOL Radio is very goodIt's nice to see the issue corrected in a timely fashion.  AOL Radio brings a huge chunk of XM to you for free...it is worth checking out.I listen to XM Satellite Radio Online. .RE: CERT: AOL Radio has high-risk flawThis...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:27:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advertising+%2526+promotion.html"><![CDATA[Advertising & Promotion]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/aol+radio.html"><![CDATA[AOL Radio]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/america+online+inc..html"><![CDATA[America Online Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/radio.html"><![CDATA[radio]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cert.html"><![CDATA[CERT]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[CERT: AOL Radio has high-risk flaw]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=796]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Computer Emergency Readiness Team has warned about a code execution flaw in the AOL Radio software.    I'm not sure how many folks use AOL Radio, but AOL still has a lot of eyeballs. If you're one of those AOL users check out the CERT warning....]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:00:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/america+online+inc..html"><![CDATA[America Online Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cert.html"><![CDATA[CERT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/radio.html"><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/flaw.html"><![CDATA[Flaw]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/aol+radio.html"><![CDATA[AOL Radio]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/u.s.+computer+emergency+readiness+team.html"><![CDATA[U.S. Computer Emergency Readiness Team]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/aolmediaplaybackcontrol+application.html"><![CDATA[AOLMediaPlaybackControl Application]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advertising+%2526+promotion.html"><![CDATA[Advertising & Promotion]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/activex%252fcom%252fcom%252b%252fdcom.html"><![CDATA[ActiveX/COM/COM+/DCOM]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/marketing.html"><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software+development.html"><![CDATA[Software Development]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software%252fweb+development.html"><![CDATA[Software/Web Development]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/larry+dignan.html"><![CDATA[Larry Dignan]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[How to run Internet Explorer securely]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://content.zdnet.com/2346-12691_22-87874.html]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are the key configuration changes you can make to  disable various features and reduce the attack surface in Microsoft's Internet Explorer. This guide provides a walk-through of IE 6.0 but applies to the latest IE 7.0 as well. (This guidance was prepared and distributed by Will Dorman, vulnerability...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Image galleries]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 08:17:58 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/web+browsers.html"><![CDATA[Web browsers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+internet+explorer.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software+engineering+institute.html"><![CDATA[Software Engineering Institute]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cert.html"><![CDATA[CERT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+internet+explorer+6.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Internet Explorer 6]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+internet+explorer+7.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Internet Explorer 7]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vulnerability.html"><![CDATA[vulnerability]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/attack.html"><![CDATA[attack]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/analyst.html"><![CDATA[analyst]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Recertifying CERT]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11202-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=17000&messageID=336228&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Recertifying CERTLeave it to a Canuckto point out how messed up the Yanks are. You need to be OUTSIDE the "system" forrest to see how it operates (the "trees"). Congrats on the big step backwards with Mr. Harper - maybe you have a GW of your own now! I don't...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 04:18:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/flaw.html"><![CDATA[flaw]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cert.html"><![CDATA[CERT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/harper.html"><![CDATA[Harper]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Recertifying CERT]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Murphy/?p=521]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[When CERT published its 2005 Vulnerabilities summary earlier year it drew hundreds of reality reversing headlines along the lines of Tom Espiner's zdnet report: "Linux and Unix 'had more vulnerabilities than Windows.'" On January 10th I looked at the list of 2,328 claimed Unix vulnerabilities only to discover them greatly...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 03:22:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cert.html"><![CDATA[CERT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vulnerability.html"><![CDATA[vulnerability]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Why CERT should be decertified (2)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11202-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=16825&messageID=332776&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Why CERT should be decertified (2)Investigative reportingis NOT dead nor an oxymoron! Thanks murph!Any counter-examples?Thanks for the list, murph. How easy to find were these examples?Did you find any counter-examples?stop advertising your incompetenceAlmost every security vendor has reported that *nix have more vulnerabilities.  However the only thing you seem...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 04:13:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/development+tools.html"><![CDATA[Development tools]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cert.html"><![CDATA[CERT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vulnerability.html"><![CDATA[vulnerability]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+system.html"><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Why CERT should be decertified (2)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Murphy/?p=508]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[In looking at Cert's security vulnerabilities summary for 2005 last week I pointed out that they have a tendency to be remarkably over enthusiastic when counting Unix and related applications vulnerabilities. This looks like systematic anti-Unix, pro-Microsoft, bias at work in a U.S. government agency. Today I'd like to look...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 03:43:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Why CERT should be decertified (1)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11202-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=16577&messageID=328979&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Why CERT should be decertified (1)Its not thatIn a large enterprise (such as Company "F"), new patches need to be CERTIFIED before they are spread out to all 170,000 PCs in the company. This means that testing is required to see if the patch breaks anything. This effort takes time,...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:45:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux.html"><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patches.html"><![CDATA[Patches]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cert.html"><![CDATA[CERT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patch+management.html"><![CDATA[patch management]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Why CERT should be decertified (1)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Murphy/?p=501]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week the CERT Institute developed at Carnegie Mellon University and now part of the "the operational arm of the National Cyber Security Division NCSD at the Department of Homeland Security," issued an annual systems security review and summary that drew They're misleading the public. That's irresponsible at best, dishonest...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 03:29:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cert.html"><![CDATA[CERT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/us-cert.html"><![CDATA[US-CERT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[Unix]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Experts question Windows win in flaw tally]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-1009-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=16504&messageID=327607&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Experts question Windows win in flaw tallyMikey has a brother Mark at Redhat?This explains everything.Mikey has a middle child complex and it turned him to the dark side."Markey works for RedhatI hate Markey, Markey gets everythingI think I'll sell my soul to microscrooge just to get even with mylousy brother"...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 11:43:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/operating+systems.html"><![CDATA[Operating systems]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/security.html"><![CDATA[SECURITY]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[OPEN SOURCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/flaw.html"><![CDATA[flaw]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/unix.html"><![CDATA[Unix]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cert.html"><![CDATA[CERT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mikey.html"><![CDATA[Mikey]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[CERT: IE bug is bait for phishers]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-1009-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=3758&messageID=77923&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[CERT: IE bug is bait for phishersFunny[i]Microsoft feverishly puts the fix together[/i]Somehow I dont think this is issue #1 for Microsoft.I'm good to go, Microsoft!My security settings were already set as highI am safe!!I switched to Firefox I have not noticed a popup in 6 months.Exscuse me butWasn't this issue...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2004 07:20:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/web+browsers.html"><![CDATA[Web browsers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/linux.html"><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+windows+2000.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows 2000]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/open+source.html"><![CDATA[OPEN SOURCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cyberthreats.html"><![CDATA[Cyberthreats]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/firefox+0.8.html"><![CDATA[Firefox 0.8]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/web+browser.html"><![CDATA[Web browser]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+internet+explorer.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mozilla+corp..html"><![CDATA[Mozilla Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/mozilla+firefox.html"><![CDATA[Mozilla Firefox]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/suse.html"><![CDATA[SuSE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/suse+9.1.html"><![CDATA[SUSE 9.1]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cert.html"><![CDATA[CERT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/phishing.html"><![CDATA[phishing]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
