<![CDATA[can-spam act Resources | ZDNet]]> en-us <![CDATA[The Economics of Spam and the Context and Aftermath of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003]]> Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:00:00 -0700 <![CDATA[SPY Acts vs. CAN-SPAM: No difference]]> Fri, 08 Jun 2007 10:45:00 -0700 <![CDATA[SPY Acts vs. CAN-SPAM: No difference]]> Fri, 08 Jun 2007 09:55:05 -0700 <![CDATA[Did Expedia violate the Can Spam Act? As a customer, I think so.]]> Tue, 27 Mar 2007 07:52:00 -0700 EXPE EXPE <![CDATA[97% of spam was not CAN-SPAM-compliant]]> Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:36:56 -0800 <![CDATA[97% of spam was not CAN-SPAM-compliant]]> Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:15:56 -0800 <![CDATA[Alleged spammer settles with Massachusetts]]> Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:24:00 -0700 <![CDATA['Wardriving' conviction is first under Can-Spam]]> Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:42:00 -0700 <![CDATA[Massachusetts files suit under Can-Spam]]> Fri, 02 Jul 2004 11:59:00 -0700 <![CDATA[FTC: Thumbs-down on 'do not e-mail' list]]> Tue, 15 Jun 2004 11:22:00 -0700 <![CDATA[Spam is still growing--and costing]]> Mon, 14 Jun 2004 09:36:00 -0700 <![CDATA[Congress moves on camera-phone porn]]> Wed, 12 May 2004 16:08:00 -0700 <![CDATA[First complaint filed under Can-Spam]]> Thu, 29 Apr 2004 15:34:00 -0700 <![CDATA[Study: Marketers fall short on Can-Spam]]> Wed, 21 Apr 2004 08:25:00 -0700 <![CDATA[ISP hammers Bob Vila site with spam suit]]> Fri, 05 Mar 2004 12:14:00 -0800 <![CDATA[Can-Spam backer to lose top exec]]> Wed, 17 Dec 2003 21:37:00 -0800 <![CDATA[Can Spam--a good first act]]> Fri, 12 Dec 2003 08:19:00 -0800