<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[california supreme court Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/california+supreme+court.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to california supreme court]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="3" found="3" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[California Supreme Court says individuals not liable for defamatory online third party acts]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12556-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=27599&messageID=517759&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[California Supreme Court says individuals not liable for defamatory online third party actsWell it makes since to meAfter all why should I be held liable for what someone else said? and making me liable would stifle free speech ...Just my 2 cents worth ...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:14:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/third+party+act.html"><![CDATA[third party act]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[California Supreme Court says individuals not liable for defamatory online third party acts]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Howell/?p=64]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[The California Supreme Courts opinion in Barrett v. Rosenthal issued today, and, as was widely anticipated, the Court reversed the appellate decision that was under review.  Although the case involved a newsgroup posting, todays decision is nevertheless excellent news for bloggers, and brings California law in line with that...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:15:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blogging.html"><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/podcasting.html"><![CDATA[Podcasting]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/user+generated+content.html"><![CDATA[User generated content]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/video.html"><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/defamation.html"><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Not thy commenter's keeper]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Howell/?p=27]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Based on the reactions of many of those who attended oral argument before the California Supreme Court in Barrett v. Rosenthal, indications are strong that the Court will come down on the side of protecting those who provide a platform for, but do not author or edit, third party comments...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 14:38:51 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/section+230.html"><![CDATA[Section 230]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
