<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[c64 Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/c64.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to c64]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[The man behind the Commodore 64]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=42169&messageID=777726&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[The man behind the Commodore 64On targetHe's right about "Americans buy anything as long as its cheap".The C64 was an electrical junk pile. The failure rate was astronomincal. The floppy disk was slower than the cassette drive for the first year or two, and likewise had a huge failure rate...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 07:04:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/productivity.html"><![CDATA[PRODUCTIVITY]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/tools+%2526+techniques.html"><![CDATA[Tools & Techniques]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/desktops.html"><![CDATA[Desktops]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/commodore+64.html"><![CDATA[Commodore 64]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/c64.html"><![CDATA[C64]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ibm+corp..html"><![CDATA[IBM Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">IBM</category>
		<category domain="tickers">IBM</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
