<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[brilliant new idea Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/brilliant+new+idea.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to brilliant new idea]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Rudy's brilliant new idea: a virtual border fence]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11155-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=41213&messageID=763058&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Rudy's brilliant new idea: a virtual border fenceActually, NO, it would NOT be a problemWe've had the technology to 'see' underground over a decade now. No reason it couldn't be added to the arsenal of technology already planned.Aside from that......the fence will have to be able to see underground to...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:21:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/rudy.html"><![CDATA[Rudy]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/brilliant+new+idea.html"><![CDATA[brilliant new idea]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/fence.html"><![CDATA[fence]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/new+idea.html"><![CDATA[new idea]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
