<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[blade pc Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blade+pc.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to blade pc]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="9" found="9" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[HP bundles XenDesktop with two blade PCs]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10532-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=60699&messageID=1116868&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[HP bundles XenDesktop with two blade PCsOh boy!I can just see 10 users sharing the same motherboard video chip.  Even for simple email I would think this setup would be dog slow.]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blade+servers.html"><![CDATA[Blade servers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/utility+computing.html"><![CDATA[Utility computing]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/xendesktop.html"><![CDATA[XenDesktop]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blade+pc.html"><![CDATA[blade PC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blade.html"><![CDATA[blade]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hewlett-packard+co..html"><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard Co.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pc.html"><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">HPQ</category>
		<category domain="tickers">HPQ</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[HP bundles XenDesktop with two blade PCs]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=12678]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[HP said Wednesday that it will bundle Citrix's XenDesktop 3 with its blade PCs that reside in data centers.    HP's BladeSystem bc2800 and bc2200 Blade PC statement are designed to be centralized clients that are controlled by an enterprise. Citrix has long been able to centralize applications....]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 02:07:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hewlett-packard+co..html"><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard Co.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pc.html"><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blade.html"><![CDATA[Blade]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blade+pc.html"><![CDATA[Blade PC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blade+servers.html"><![CDATA[Blade Servers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/utility+computing.html"><![CDATA[Utility Computing]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/servers.html"><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hardware.html"><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/larry+dignan.html"><![CDATA[Larry Dignan]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/larry+dignan.html"><![CDATA[Larry Dignan]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">HPQ</category>
		<category domain="tickers">HPQ</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[HP Thin Client & Blade PC Solutions: Fiona Wright]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://whitepapers.zdnet.com/abstract.aspx?docid=348560]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[The presenter of this webcast speaks about the key features of remote client solutions and how they can benefit teachers and students alike. ]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Webcasts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hewlett-packard+co..html"><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard Co.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pc.html"><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blade.html"><![CDATA[Blade]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blade+pc.html"><![CDATA[Blade PC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/thin+client.html"><![CDATA[Thin Client]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blade+servers.html"><![CDATA[Blade Servers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/thin+clients.html"><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/servers.html"><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hardware.html"><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">HPQ</category>
		<category domain="tickers">HPQ</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[HP ships third generation of blade PC solution with new Athlon 64]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10741-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=34883&messageID=641540&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[HP ships third generation of blade PC solution with new Athlon 64Purely centralized processingis not the way to go. The final solution will be a hybrid approach. Even the largest datacenters will be crippled under a particular dynamic load. It's just like a freeway, if everyone gets on the road...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:30:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/processors.html"><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blade+servers.html"><![CDATA[Blade servers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/amd+athlon.html"><![CDATA[AMD Athlon]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/amd+athlon+64.html"><![CDATA[AMD Athlon 64]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blade+pc.html"><![CDATA[blade PC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/advanced+micro+devices+inc..html"><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hewlett-packard+co..html"><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard Co.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/thin+client.html"><![CDATA[thin client]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blade.html"><![CDATA[blade]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMD</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">HPQ</category>
		<category domain="tickers">AMD,HPQ</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[HP ships third generation of blade PC solution with new Athlon 64]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.zdnet.com/Berlind/?p=528]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[HP must be getting something right with its blade PC-based solution.  Despite the way the HP's approach seems to take go the opposite  direction to the way that client-side computing trends are heading, the company is today launching its third generation of the architecture; a sign that it's...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:35:08 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/software+infrastructure.html"><![CDATA[Software Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/it+management.html"><![CDATA[IT Management]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hardware+infrastructure.html"><![CDATA[Hardware Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/general.html"><![CDATA[General]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[HP ushers in new blade PC, switches chips]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=14936&messageID=298248&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[HP ushers in new blade PC, switches chipsfiber/802.3 kvm solutions...there is one aspect of blade pcs that CTO's and managers must account for..  running a VGA cable to another floor is impossable without KVM extending technology.  Fiber based KVM extenders are expensive yet offer great flexability (peer-to-peer fiber...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 11:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blade+servers.html"><![CDATA[Blade servers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/desktops.html"><![CDATA[Desktops]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network+technology.html"><![CDATA[Network technology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hewlett-packard+co..html"><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard Co.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/chip.html"><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/personal+computers.html"><![CDATA[PERSONAL COMPUTERS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blade+pc.html"><![CDATA[blade PC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blade.html"><![CDATA[blade]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pc.html"><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/fiber.html"><![CDATA[fiber]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">HPQ</category>
		<category domain="tickers">HPQ</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[NORAD gives thumbs up to blade PCs]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=9752&messageID=193162&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[NORAD gives thumbs up to blade PCsClearCubeNothing agin' HP but I'm glad someone else got the contract. This industry needs competition, not stagnation. Oops, did I say Dell?Nice and warminside that mountain! Once rack with 100 servers requires QUITE A BIT of electrical power. Not to mention the cooling that...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2005 04:40:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blade+servers.html"><![CDATA[Blade servers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/utility+computing.html"><![CDATA[Utility computing]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/servers.html"><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/desktops.html"><![CDATA[Desktops]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blade.html"><![CDATA[blade]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blade+pc.html"><![CDATA[blade PC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pc.html"><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/north+american+aerospace+defense+command.html"><![CDATA[North American Aerospace Defense Command]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cheyenne+mountain.html"><![CDATA[Cheyenne Mountain]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network.html"><![CDATA[network]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[HP unsheathes its blade PC]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-9584-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=2973&messageID=62419&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[HP unsheathes its blade PCand the pundits said thin client was dead[i]The new blade PCs can be used, in conjunction with the company's thin clients, to replace the networked desktop PCs that most companies now issue their employees, HP says.To use the Consolidated Client Infrastructure, a company places an inexpensive...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2004 06:26:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blade+servers.html"><![CDATA[Blade servers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/thin+clients.html"><![CDATA[Thin clients]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/utility+computing.html"><![CDATA[Utility computing]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/desktops.html"><![CDATA[Desktops]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blade+pc.html"><![CDATA[blade PC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blade.html"><![CDATA[blade]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/thin+client.html"><![CDATA[thin client]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hewlett-packard+co..html"><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard Co.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pc.html"><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/desktop.html"><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">HPQ</category>
		<category domain="tickers">HPQ</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Blade PC company links up with IBM]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-3513-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=1915&messageID=40286&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Blade PC company links up with IBMComplicated Thin ClientWhy would this solution be better than a centrally managed Terminal Server with thin-clients connecting through the network?  You would still be managing hundreds of blades that can fail... not to mention hundreds of blades that will have to be patched...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2004 07:46:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blade+servers.html"><![CDATA[Blade servers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/utility+computing.html"><![CDATA[Utility computing]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/servers.html"><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blade.html"><![CDATA[blade]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/blade+pc.html"><![CDATA[blade PC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/ibm+corp..html"><![CDATA[IBM Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/pc.html"><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">IBM</category>
		<category domain="tickers">IBM</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
