<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[bilski Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/bilski.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to bilski]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Cygnus files first challenge to Bilski patent standard]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10535-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=55872&messageID=1055060&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Cygnus files first challenge to Bilski patent standardStupid?I have to say that actually surprised me.Cygnus' claim is one of the most stupid things I have ever seen, if you read through the comments on the patent request itself you'll see why.http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/7346850/claims.htmlI have seen what they 'invented' at LEAST 4 years...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 03:59:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patent.html"><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/bilski.html"><![CDATA[Bilski]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/cygnus+inc..html"><![CDATA[Cygnus Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patent+standard.html"><![CDATA[patent standard]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/microsoft+corp..html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MSFT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MSFT</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
