<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[banning scientology Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/banning+scientology.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to banning scientology]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Banning Scientology doesn't make Wikipedia more credible]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12355-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=65076&messageID=1213489&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Banning Scientology doesn't make Wikipedia more credibleSorry Chris... an effort to do something is better than no effort. ntntNo, but it sure makes the Thetans angry.]:)Scientology - shrugIt's better to keep 'm exposed as warped 'personality-tests' doing whackos.RE: Banning Scientology doesn't make Wikipedia more credibleChris,   I agree with...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 13:24:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/wiki.html"><![CDATA[Wiki]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/scientology.html"><![CDATA[Scientology]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/wikipedia.html"><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/banning+scientology.html"><![CDATA[Banning Scientology]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
