<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[avr Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/avr.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to avr]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Patch management: Find the weakest link]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-1107-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=1562&messageID=31614&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Patch management: Find the weakest linkThe weakest link is always the Microsoft link!Nuff said, mutha boo. Flame on, peoples..This story is so full of flame bait where do I start"a patch is not a fix"The company (unnamed :)) supplying the patch needs to fix what the heck we are patching...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2004 05:07:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patches.html"><![CDATA[Patches]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/patch+management.html"><![CDATA[patch management]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/hercules.html"><![CDATA[Hercules]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/avr.html"><![CDATA[AVR]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/vulnerability.html"><![CDATA[vulnerability]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
