<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://updates.zdnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[atom nas Resources | ZDNet]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/atom+nas.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, technical articles, and blog posts relating to atom nas]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[QNAP introduces 'smallest 8-bay Atom NAS']]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-13615-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=65945&messageID=1237865&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[QNAP introduces 'smallest 8-bay Atom NAS'Less energy use, but MUCH less storage...Because it uses 2.5" drives, it is smaller and more energy efficient - BUT - you can't buy a 2 TB 2.5" drive. Best I've seen is 500GB. So considering you would need to fill all 8 drive bays...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:54:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/network-attached+storage+%2528nas%2529.html"><![CDATA[Network-attached storage (NAS)]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/storage.html"><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/nas.html"><![CDATA[NAS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/atom+nas.html"><![CDATA[Atom NAS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://updates.zdnet.com/tags/qnap.html"><![CDATA[QNap]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
